Why you should consider the Fair Tax Mark

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Why you should consider the Fair Tax Mark

It would be an understatement to say that many large corporations have found their reputations dragged through the mud over their tax affairs.

Google's laudable pledge of "don't be evil" backfired when British parliamentarians led by the combative Margaret Hodge decided that the company's tax arrangements came across as just a little bit too evil for their liking. Much of Starbucks' good work building up a positive corporate social responsibility profile over sustainability and support for fair trade products was undone when it was revealed to have paid no tax for 14 out of the 15 years it had been operating in the UK. The scandal and subsequent boycott threatened to hit Starbucks' sales by 24% – according to researchers at Manchester Business School – and caused it to promise to make a voluntary tax contribution.


"If the media won’t write you a good tax story, you can write your own"


The public are up in arms. Governments are cracking down. What companies need is a good tax story. And that's where the Fair Tax Mark comes in. Launched last month, the Fair Tax Mark seeks to be to corporate taxation what the Fair Trade Mark is to coffee and cocoa. It rewards companies for good tax behaviour. It is a badge of honour for companies shown to be acting within the spirit of the law and eschewing tax havens.

How much tax a company pays is not the overriding factor. After all, there are perfectly legitimate reasons why a company may pay no tax in a given jurisdiction in a certain year. Losses and reliefs, for example. Instead the Fair Tax Mark judges a company on its tax policy, its transparency and its accountability.

The Mark was launched in the UK with the backing of the Midcounties Co-op, Unity Trust Bank and the Phone Co-op. As such, it's a modest start – when it comes to corporate social responsibility, these companies are very much among the usual suspects. But the Mark's makers hope over time it will be taken up much more widely.

The saying used to go that there is "no such thing as a good tax story". The Fair Tax Mark is a chance for multinational corporations to grab the bull by the horns and change that. If the media won't write you a good tax story, you can write your own. The most successful businesses know how to turn crisis into opportunity. Companies are facing their greatest ever crisis over tax and PR. And their greatest ever opportunity.

Salman Shaheen

Editor, International Tax Review
sshaheen@euromoneyplc.com

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

One expert argues the ERS would be unlikely to improve taxpayers’ experience unless it comes with additional funding to hire more agents and staff
From pillar two and amount B to Apple’s headline EU Commission dispute, Martin Bonner and Yiwen Ping of Kreston Global argue that 2024’s key TP developments will inform 2025
Holland & Knight, Nelson Mullins and McCarter & English made the joint-most tax partner hires in the US last year, according to annual ITR Talent Tracker data
Despite a three-year-high in tax revenues generated from settling TP cases, HMRC reported a sharp fall in resolved MAP disputes
Inflexion’s proposed minority stake in Baker Tilly Netherlands could propel the firm in the Dutch market, CEO Ronald Hoeksel tells ITR
While the US’s dramatic exit from the OECD’s global tax deal naturally grabbed headlines, Trump’s premeditated move shouldn’t detract from pillar two’s lofty ambitions
The ‘big four’ firm’s audit of gambling company Entain is under the spotlight; in other news, Ireland shrugs off Trump’s rejection of pillar two
Mid-market European private equity house Inflexion, which also backs law firm DWF, has agreed to acquire a minority stake in the Dutch tax advisory firm
Donald Trump’s inauguration, pillar two, APAs and TP were all up for discussion as ITR spoke to Baker McKenzie’s two newly minted US partners
In-house teams that want a balance of internal control and external expertise for pillar two should seriously consider co-sourcing models, Russell Gammon of Tax Systems argues
Gift this article