Brazil: Tax authorities issue guidance on the treatment of software as a service

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Brazil: Tax authorities issue guidance on the treatment of software as a service

intl-updates-small.jpg

The Brazilian tax authorities attempt to resolve the withholding tax treatment of payments in relation to software, which has been a controversial issue for several years.

Giacobbo
Conomy

Fernando Giacobbo

Mark Conomy

On March 29 2017, the Brazilian tax authorities (RFB) published Solução de Consulta 191/2017 (SC 191/2017) (dated March 23 2017), confirming that withholding tax and Contribuição sobre Intervenção no Domínio Econômico (CIDE) should apply on payments made in relation to importations of software as a service (SaaS) from abroad.

The tax treatment of payments in relation to software has been a controversial issue over the years. Common issues include whether the software should be considered as an off-the-shelf product versus a customised technical service versus a royalty type license to use. Depending on the nature of the payments, the tax consequences can differ substantially, reinforcing the need for careful analysis and definition of what is being imported.

In the particular circumstances contemplated by SC 191/2017, the company making the importation of the SaaS was involved in the commercialisation of access/usage authorisations acquired from abroad for resale to users/clients in Brazil. The SaaS could be accessed by users from any computer/mobile device using a password. Authorisation for access occurred remotely via the internet where the users could access a databank in the 'cloud' rather than a determined location. The access authorisations contemplated two elements:

  • Network protection against viruses, spam and other threats; and

  • Access to online conferences, meetings, training and internet projects and information for real time sharing.

It was highlighted that while offered to clients on a broad basis, the SaaS was not a product made to order or a multiple-copy software that should be considered an off-the-shelf product. The RFB also clarified that in the present case, the SaaS being imported was a licence to use for resale as opposed to a license to commercialise/distribute.

The RFB examined the elements of what was being imported, concluding that the monthly payment for the SaaS was in consideration for diverse services similar to a package of utilities. When determining whether the SaaS should be considered a technical service, the RFB relied on the concept of a technical service set out in Normative Instruction 1,455/2014 which included activities rendered through automated structures with clear technological content within the relevant definition.

Pursuant to SC 191/2017, the RFB concluded that withholding tax and CIDE should be levied at source on amounts paid, credited, delivered, employed or remitted abroad as compensation for the SaaS, which they considered as technical services, depending on specialised knowledge in computer science and coming from automated structures with clear technological content.

By way of background, a Solução de Consulta is a formal response by the RFB to consultation made by a taxpayer and although this document does not represent legal precedent, it does provide further support and guidance for Brazilian entities in relation to how the RFB are treating such arrangements from a transactional tax.

Fernando Giacobbo (fernando.giacobbo@pwc.com) and Mark Conomy (mark.conomy@pwc.com)

PwC

Tel: +55 11 3674-2582 and +55 11 3674-2519

Website: www.pwc.com.br

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

One expert argues the ERS would be unlikely to improve taxpayers’ experience unless it comes with additional funding to hire more agents and staff
From pillar two and amount B to Apple’s headline EU Commission dispute, Martin Bonner and Yiwen Ping of Kreston Global argue that 2024’s key TP developments will inform 2025
Holland & Knight, Nelson Mullins and McCarter & English made the joint-most tax partner hires in the US last year, according to annual ITR Talent Tracker data
Despite a three-year-high in tax revenues generated from settling TP cases, HMRC reported a sharp fall in resolved MAP disputes
Inflexion’s proposed minority stake in Baker Tilly Netherlands could propel the firm in the Dutch market, CEO Ronald Hoeksel tells ITR
While the US’s dramatic exit from the OECD’s global tax deal naturally grabbed headlines, Trump’s premeditated move shouldn’t detract from pillar two’s lofty ambitions
The ‘big four’ firm’s audit of gambling company Entain is under the spotlight; in other news, Ireland shrugs off Trump’s rejection of pillar two
Mid-market European private equity house Inflexion, which also backs law firm DWF, has agreed to acquire a minority stake in the Dutch tax advisory firm
Donald Trump’s inauguration, pillar two, APAs and TP were all up for discussion as ITR spoke to Baker McKenzie’s two newly minted US partners
In-house teams that want a balance of internal control and external expertise for pillar two should seriously consider co-sourcing models, Russell Gammon of Tax Systems argues
Gift this article