Indonesia: Indonesia targeting cross-border and online transactions

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Indonesia: Indonesia targeting cross-border and online transactions

Karyadi-Freddy
Puspita

Freddy Karyadi

Luna Puspita

In March 2016, the Indonesian Government disclosed its plan to optimise tax revenue from various uncollected taxes due on cross-border and online transactions involving the e-commerce business sector and certain individual taxpayers.

Further, the Ministry of Finance has unveiled its data relating to at least 6,000 Indonesian citizens having offshore accounts and around 2,000 foreign investment companies which are alleged to have engaged in illegal tax abuse by committing improper cross-border transfer pricing and by abusing tax holidays and tax incentives. The Indonesia Investment Coordinating Board (BKPM) may revoke the business licenses of such foreign invesment companies if the allegation is proven.

To follow up the Panama Papers, during April 2016, the government states it will first validate the information in the Panama Papers then match those records with its own data relating to alleged unreported assets and income of certain Indonesian individuals and corporations in order to find any room to improve tax revenue. The data pertaining to credit card transactions which are now transparent to the tax authority would also be used to boost the tax revenue. Further, other government agencies such as the anti-money laundering agency, the customs authority and the National drugs body would share their information with the tax authority to improve the tax authority's ability to analyse the tax revenue potency.

Simultaneously, according to the press, the tax authority indicates that Google, Yahoo, Facebook and Twitter in Indonesia have not fully complied with their tax obligation as they have only registered themselves as representative offices instead of as permanent establishments generating income from Indonesia. A representative office in Indonesia is not allowed to generate revenue in Indonesia. From the investigation conducted, it is alleged that the revenues obtained by Google, Yahoo, Facebook and Twitter in Indonesia are booked directly by their companies in Singapore. Aside from these four tech companies, a further 3,500 representative offices of foreign entities are also under scrutiny of the tax authority for similar reasons.

Freddy Karyadi (fkaryadi@abnrlaw.com) and Luna Puspita (lpuspita@abnrlaw.com), Jakarta

Ali Budiardjo, Nugroho, Reksodiputro, Counsellors at Law

Tel: +62 21 250 5125

Website: www.abnrlaw.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

In looking at the impact of taxation, money won't always be all there is to it
Australia’s Tax Practitioners Board is set to kick off 2026 with a new secretary to head the administrative side of its regulatory activities.
Ireland’s Department of Finance reported increased income tax, VAT and corporation tax receipts from 2024; in other news, it’s understood that HSBC has agreed to pay the French treasury to settle a tax investigation
The Australian Taxation Office believes the Swedish furniture company has used TP to evade paying tax it owes
Supermarket chain Morrisons is facing a £17 million ($23 million) tax bill; in other news, Donald Trump has cut proposed tariffs
The controversial deal will allow US-parented groups to be carved out from key aspects of pillar two
Awards
ITR invites tax firms, in-house teams, and tax professionals to make submissions for the 2027 World Tax rankings and the 2026 ITR Tax Awards globally
Pillar two was ‘weakened’ when it altered from a multinational convention agreement to simply national domestic law, Federico Bertocchi also argued
Imposing the tax on virtual assets is a measure that appears to have no legal, economic or statistical basis, one expert told ITR
The EU has seemingly capitulated to the US’s ‘side-by-side’ demands. This may be a win for the US, but the uncertainty has only just begun for pillar two
Gift this article