Indonesia: Indonesia targeting cross-border and online transactions

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Indonesia: Indonesia targeting cross-border and online transactions

Karyadi-Freddy
Puspita

Freddy Karyadi

Luna Puspita

In March 2016, the Indonesian Government disclosed its plan to optimise tax revenue from various uncollected taxes due on cross-border and online transactions involving the e-commerce business sector and certain individual taxpayers.

Further, the Ministry of Finance has unveiled its data relating to at least 6,000 Indonesian citizens having offshore accounts and around 2,000 foreign investment companies which are alleged to have engaged in illegal tax abuse by committing improper cross-border transfer pricing and by abusing tax holidays and tax incentives. The Indonesia Investment Coordinating Board (BKPM) may revoke the business licenses of such foreign invesment companies if the allegation is proven.

To follow up the Panama Papers, during April 2016, the government states it will first validate the information in the Panama Papers then match those records with its own data relating to alleged unreported assets and income of certain Indonesian individuals and corporations in order to find any room to improve tax revenue. The data pertaining to credit card transactions which are now transparent to the tax authority would also be used to boost the tax revenue. Further, other government agencies such as the anti-money laundering agency, the customs authority and the National drugs body would share their information with the tax authority to improve the tax authority's ability to analyse the tax revenue potency.

Simultaneously, according to the press, the tax authority indicates that Google, Yahoo, Facebook and Twitter in Indonesia have not fully complied with their tax obligation as they have only registered themselves as representative offices instead of as permanent establishments generating income from Indonesia. A representative office in Indonesia is not allowed to generate revenue in Indonesia. From the investigation conducted, it is alleged that the revenues obtained by Google, Yahoo, Facebook and Twitter in Indonesia are booked directly by their companies in Singapore. Aside from these four tech companies, a further 3,500 representative offices of foreign entities are also under scrutiny of the tax authority for similar reasons.

Freddy Karyadi (fkaryadi@abnrlaw.com) and Luna Puspita (lpuspita@abnrlaw.com), Jakarta

Ali Budiardjo, Nugroho, Reksodiputro, Counsellors at Law

Tel: +62 21 250 5125

Website: www.abnrlaw.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The case sits within a context of Brazil signalling that it is replacing informal discretion and ambiguity with structures that reward analytical rigour, one expert tells ITR
Jeff Soar lifts the lid on WTS UK’s ambitious recruitment plans, the firm's positioning against the big four, and why tax is the perfect profession for AI
The move reinforces Milan’s role as a key European hub for international business, the firm said
Australia’s government has also announced that it will implement the pillar two side-by-side agreement
Sara Morgan is due to join Joseph Hage Aaronson & Bremen as a partner in London, ITR understands
The newly combined tax team has already worked on thousands of joint client matters, leaders from McDermott Will & Schulte tell ITR
As AI becomes increasingly intuitive and idiot-proof, its tax applicability is becoming impossible to overstate
New data on public CbCR showed uneven adoption, as Singapore advanced pillar two compliance and firms expanded their tax capabilities
Nearly two years after its publication, the Corporate Tax Roadmap is reshaping the UK’s TP framework through incremental reforms focused on scope, transparency and earlier HMRC intervention
With a stark divergence between MNEs that prepared early and those rushing to catch up, advisers must remain agile with all manner of compliance risks
Gift this article