Indonesia: Indonesia targeting cross-border and online transactions

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Indonesia: Indonesia targeting cross-border and online transactions

Karyadi-Freddy
Puspita

Freddy Karyadi

Luna Puspita

In March 2016, the Indonesian Government disclosed its plan to optimise tax revenue from various uncollected taxes due on cross-border and online transactions involving the e-commerce business sector and certain individual taxpayers.

Further, the Ministry of Finance has unveiled its data relating to at least 6,000 Indonesian citizens having offshore accounts and around 2,000 foreign investment companies which are alleged to have engaged in illegal tax abuse by committing improper cross-border transfer pricing and by abusing tax holidays and tax incentives. The Indonesia Investment Coordinating Board (BKPM) may revoke the business licenses of such foreign invesment companies if the allegation is proven.

To follow up the Panama Papers, during April 2016, the government states it will first validate the information in the Panama Papers then match those records with its own data relating to alleged unreported assets and income of certain Indonesian individuals and corporations in order to find any room to improve tax revenue. The data pertaining to credit card transactions which are now transparent to the tax authority would also be used to boost the tax revenue. Further, other government agencies such as the anti-money laundering agency, the customs authority and the National drugs body would share their information with the tax authority to improve the tax authority's ability to analyse the tax revenue potency.

Simultaneously, according to the press, the tax authority indicates that Google, Yahoo, Facebook and Twitter in Indonesia have not fully complied with their tax obligation as they have only registered themselves as representative offices instead of as permanent establishments generating income from Indonesia. A representative office in Indonesia is not allowed to generate revenue in Indonesia. From the investigation conducted, it is alleged that the revenues obtained by Google, Yahoo, Facebook and Twitter in Indonesia are booked directly by their companies in Singapore. Aside from these four tech companies, a further 3,500 representative offices of foreign entities are also under scrutiny of the tax authority for similar reasons.

Freddy Karyadi (fkaryadi@abnrlaw.com) and Luna Puspita (lpuspita@abnrlaw.com), Jakarta

Ali Budiardjo, Nugroho, Reksodiputro, Counsellors at Law

Tel: +62 21 250 5125

Website: www.abnrlaw.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

ITR understands that UK Chancellor Rachel Reeves will announce a consultation on the proposed financial reward scheme, which had left advisers fretting
The long-running dispute centres on Medtronic’s use of the comparable uncontrolled transaction TP method; in other news, Paul Hastings and FTI Consulting both made double tax hires
The boutique Australian firm’s TP award recognition proves that world-class advisory services aren’t limited to the ‘big four’, the firm’s founder tells ITR
Canadian and Indian dual VAT models have been a source of inspiration for the Brazilian model, but the latter has unique and innovative features, the OECD paper claimed
More sophisticated use of technology, heightened TP scrutiny and stricter filing requirements are making South African Revenue Service audits a formidable challenge
The hire of Doug Wick expands Baker McKenzie’s state and local tax practice and adds to the firm’s growing ex-IRS expertise
One year after Nuwaru joined the WTS network, leaders James Jobson and Matthew Missaghi reflect on the firm’s mission to offer mid-tier pricing but deliver top-tier results
Join ITR's Head of Research, John Harrison, for an overview of key dates, new developments, best practices, and more for next year’s research cycle
The president’s tariff regime has already caused misery for taxpayers. Losing at the Supreme Court would mean it was all for nothing
The US itself was the biggest loser of tax revenue to American multinationals’ profit shifting, the Tax Justice Network reported; in other news, firms made key tax hires
Gift this article