Italy: Italian Revenue Agency issues guidelines on LBOs

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Italy: Italian Revenue Agency issues guidelines on LBOs

Saccardo
Valdonio

Nicola Saccardo

Marco Valdonio

On March 30 2016 the Italian Revenue Agency issued comprehensive guidelines on the tax treatment of leveraged buyout transactions (LBOs) and similar acquisition structures, with a particular reference to investments by private equity funds.

The guidelines are meant to bring clarity for the benefit of foreign investors and address, among others, the following subjects: interest deduction, deduction of fees charged to the acquisition vehicle or the target company, deduction of input VAT on such fees, carry forward of tax losses following a merger, withholding taxes on interest payments, tax regime of shareholders loans and of capital gains on shares or dividends upon exit. Here we report on some of the important points laid down in the guidelines.

The Revenue Agency has been used to challenge interest deduction in LBOs relying on different legal grounds, including the abusive nature of the allocation of the debt to the Italian acquisition vehicle. In the guidelines the Revenue recognises that the interest expenses incurred by the Italian acquisition vehicle are in principle deductible, save for certain exceptions where abuse can be identified (for example, in case of maintenance of control by the same direct or indirect shareholder). This conclusion is held valid irrespective of the residence of the shareholders (subject to the comments below regarding shareholders' loans). The guidelines invite the tax offices to review pending litigations in the light of such principles.

The guidelines further indicate that the Revenue will adopt a substance-over-form approach to re-characterise shareholders' loan as equity. Specific criteria that will be used for such purpose are listed. The Revenue holds that penalties for infringements committed before the issuance of the guidelines may not apply and that the deduction for the notional remuneration for equity would apply in the event of re-characterisation.

The guidelines also address the application of treaty benefits on the capital gains on shares, realised upon exit by non-resident companies established by foreign funds in tax-friendly jurisdictions. Particularly, they clarify that treaty benefits will be denied to the shareholders in the case of either a 'light' organisational structure of such companies or the pure mirroring nature of their sources and uses. Clarifications on how these tests will be performed are set out in the guidelines.

The guidelines will have to be taken into due account while structuring new acquisitions and assessing the need to restructure any existing structure due to potential exposures.

Nicola Saccardo (n.saccardo@maisto.it) and Marco Valdonio (m.valdonio@maisto.it)

Maisto e Associati

Tel: +44 207 3740 299 and +39 02 776931

Website: www.maisto.it

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Overall revenues for the combined UK and Swiss firm inched up 2% to £3.6 billion despite a ‘challenging market’
In the first of a two-part series, experts from Khaitan & Co dissect a highly anticipated Indian Supreme Court ruling that marks a decisive shift in India’s international tax jurisprudence
The OECD profile signals Brazil is no longer a jurisdiction where TP can be treated as a mechanical compliance exercise, one expert suggests, though another highlights 'significant concerns'
Libya’s often-overlooked stamp duty can halt payments and freeze contracts, making this quiet tax a decisive hurdle for foreign investors to clear, writes Salaheddin El Busefi
Eugena Cerny shares hard-earned lessons from tax automation projects and explains how to navigate internal roadblocks and miscommunications
The Clifford Chance and Hyatt cases collectively confirm a fundamental principle of international tax law: permanent establishment is a concept based on physical and territorial presence
Australian government minister Andrew Leigh reflects on the fallout of the scandal three years on and looks ahead to regulatory changes
The US president’s threats expose how one superpower can subjugate other countries using tariffs as an economic weapon
The US president has softened his stance on tariffs over Greenland; in other news, a partner from Osborne Clarke has won a High Court appeal against the Solicitors Regulation Authority
Emmanuel Manda tells ITR about early morning boxing, working on Zambia’s only refinery, and what makes tax cool
Gift this article