Chile: Understanding the new employee stock option plans

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Chile: Understanding the new employee stock option plans

Agliati
nunez.jpg

César Agliati

Ignacio Núñez

The tax treatment of Employee Stock Options (ESOPS) will change from January 1 2017 when the Tax Reform Law No. 20.780 of September 2014, included in Article 17 No. 8 of the Chilean Income tax law, incorporates new rules in order to apply taxes to the different stages of an ESOP.

Under these new criteria, the taxation of an ESOP could be triggered when they are granted because the new law states that being "able to subscribe an ESOP" would generate a benefit for the employee, counselor or director. In this case, the difference between the valuation of the option and the price paid by the employee in order to subscribe to the ESOP, if any was paid, would be the taxable income.

Circular Letter No. 70 of 2015, which interprets the new ESOP rules, indicates that the benefit obtained at the time of the granting of an ESOP could be used at the time of the transfer of the ESOP to a third party as part of its cost, so the triggered taxation would amount to the difference between the benefit obtained on the day granted and the price of sale of the option.

Existing rules

Before the 2014 Tax Reform Law, the tax treatment of ESOPS was only addressed through rulings by the Chilean Internal Revenue Service because they were excluded from the Derivatives Law No. 20.544 of 2011.

The existing tax treatment of the ESOPS, which will be applicable until December 31 2016, depends on whether the ESOPS were given as part of employment remuneration or if they were acquired by the worker using their own income.

ESOPS are taxable at the exercise day, which means that the difference between the price of the shares at the day of the exercise of the ESOPS and its acquisition cost would be treated as a higher remuneration subject to employment income tax law.

If the shares were acquired by the employee with his own resources, the ESOPS would be only taxable at the point of sale of the exercised shares. This means that the granting, vesting and exercise of the ESOPS would not trigger any taxable event as long as no capital gain is generated due to the sale of shares.

Finally, the Chilean Income Tax Law permits the accruing of employment benefits for the lifespan of the corresponding benefit, in the case of benefits established in employment contracts and for a 12 month period since its granting, if it was a voluntary benefit.

New tax application

The applicable taxation to the exercise of an ESOP would amount to the difference between the book or market value of the shares included in the ESOP and the benefit originally obtained at the granting of the ESOP under the new rules entering into force.

Under these new rules, it is important for companies to examine the clauses and content of any ESOP plan carefully because tax could be applied at any given stage of an ESOP.

Existing legislation has not solved the tax treatment of the Option granted to the employees as deductible expenses for the company.

If the exercise price of the ESOP is inferior to the cost of the shares acquired by the company, the Chilean Internal Revenue Service has not indicated whether the company would be able to consider that amount as a deductible expense or if it would be considered as a rejected expense subject to a sole tax of 40% (from 2017 onwards). Furthermore, the valuation rules applicable in order to determine the cost of the shares for the company, are not clear enough in the existing legislation.

Also, under the new ESOP rules, the accruing of the benefits for the employee and how they are going to recognize it in their tax returns is still being discussed.

Once the Chilean Internal Revenue Service starts to audit ESOPS, we should be able to distinguish between ESOPS or any other kind of instruments that are preferable as employment benefits.

César Agliati (agliati.cesar@cl.pwc.com) and Ignacio Núñez (ignacio.nunez@cl.pwc.com)

PwC Chile

Tel: +56 2 2940 0000

Website: www.pwc.cl

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

It’s the second year in a row that RSM’s tax business has posted fee income growth above 10%
Recent guidance from the Indian tax authorities should provide confidence for investors, says Sanjay Sanghvi of Khaitan & Co
Grant Wardell-Johnson also suggests there could be solutions to the friction between the US and the OECD when it comes to pillar two.
The president had so far avoided announcing tariffs on the US’s neighbours despite previous threats
The firm brought in three managing directors from EY and Deloitte in Europe; in other news, KPMG’s bid to practise law in US was delayed
One expert argues the ERS would be unlikely to improve taxpayers’ experience unless it comes with additional funding to hire more agents and staff
From pillar two and amount B to Apple’s headline EU Commission dispute, Martin Bonner and Yiwen Ping of Kreston Global argue that 2024’s key TP developments will inform 2025
Holland & Knight, Nelson Mullins and McCarter & English made the joint-most tax partner hires in the US last year, according to annual ITR Talent Tracker data
Despite a three-year-high in tax revenues generated from settling TP cases, HMRC reported a sharp fall in resolved MAP disputes
Inflexion’s proposed minority stake in Baker Tilly Netherlands could propel the firm in the Dutch market, CEO Ronald Hoeksel tells ITR
Gift this article