New Zealand Inland Revenue expands monitoring of large taxpayers

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

New Zealand Inland Revenue expands monitoring of large taxpayers

Sponsored by

sponsored-firms-russel-mcveagh.png
intl-updates-small.jpg

The New Zealand Inland Revenue has announced that it will be increasing the number of large taxpayers that it monitors as part of its Basic Compliance Package (BCP). Inland Revenue's announcement comes at a time of increased media and political attention on the tax affairs of foreign-owned multinational groups.

lester.jpg

James Lester

Approach towards large taxpayer compliance

All large taxpayers are subject to an annual compliance review by Inland Revenue. The BCP requires taxpayers to supply information to Inland Revenue each year, including details of the group's structure, its financial statements and tax reconciliations. When the BCP was first introduced, Inland Revenue said it would allow greater macro-analysis of industries and the identification of variations by jurisdiction. Multinational groups could, according to Inland Revenue, expect to receive more tailored information requests and audit inquiries as a result.

Since 2012, around 600 New Zealand and foreign-owned groups have been subject to the BCP. In addition to the BCP, the compliance activities of the largest 50 corporate taxpayers are account managed by Inland Revenue on a one-to-one basis.

Expansion of the BCP

From 2017, the number of groups subject to the BCP will increase to around 900, including all foreign-owned multinational groups that have a turnover of more than NZ$30 million ($21 million). This represents a significant expansion of the BCP as a compliance tool, highlighting Inland Revenue's preference for receiving comprehensive and standardised information relating to a group's tax affairs over and above the information provided in annual tax returns.

As indicated above, the announcement coincides with questions raised by the media and opposition members of parliament about the declining number of audits carried out by Inland Revenue on large taxpayers. Inland Revenue's statement on the measure on September 30 acknowledged that the "no surprises environment" created by the BCP has reduced the need for formal audits on large enterprises to be undertaken.

OECD's guidance on tax control frameworks

Inland Revenue's Large Enterprises Update (August 2016) recorded Inland Revenue's support for the OECD's Guidance on Tax Control Frameworks, recently released by the organisation 's Forum on Tax Administration (FTA guidance). Inland Revenue considers that the FTA guidance applies particularly to large enterprises, and recommends that corporate boards of directors put in place documented tax strategies as well as systems, procedures and resources to manage tax risk as a means of "setting the right tone from the top".

Inland Revenue recognises that a tax strategy will depend upon the particular circumstances of that business and the industry in question. Inland Revenue's update does refer specifically, however, to the Business and Industry Advisory Committee's (BIAC) Statement of Tax Principles for International Business. BIAC's statement covers tax planning and transparency principles, including that international businesses:

  • Should only engage in tax planning that is aligned with commercial and economic activity and ensure it does not lead to an abusive result;

  • Should interpret relevant tax laws in a reasonable way, consistent with a relationship of "co-operative compliance" with tax authorities; and

  • Be open and transparent with tax authorities in each jurisdiction about their tax affairs and provide the relevant, reasonably requested information (subject to appropriate confidentiality provisions) that is necessary to enable a reasonable review of possible tax risk.

James Lester (james.lester@russellmcveagh.com)

Russell McVeagh

Tel: +64 4 819 7755

Website: www.russellmcveagh.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

India also brokered its first-ever multilateral APA last year, the Central Board of Taxes announced
A global tax framework may not materialise anytime soon, but a common set of principles is becoming increasingly necessary, Rudolf Winkenius also tells ITR
Kingsley Napley’s claimants are arguing that taxing the provision of education breaches the European Convention on Human Rights
While pillar two can progress without the US, it won’t reach the same heights without American involvement, argues Renáta Bláhová, founding partner of BMB Partners Taxand
There are unanswered questions as to how foreign investors could reclaim money via tax credits, advisers suggested
Amid an ever-changing tax environment, India’s advisory market is bustling with competition ahead of the 2025 World Tax rankings and ITR Awards
The deal comes after PwC had accused Paul McNab of using confidential information; in other news, McDermott hired a new London tax head from a US rival
Looking at transfer pricing simplification is “obviously helpful”, but it should be done in line with current standards, a senior government figure reportedly said
The UK Government’s plans to close the tax gap via increased HM Revenue and Customs investment have failed to impress local tax advisers
Under the merged scheme for R&D tax relief introduced last year, rules on contracted out R&D have changed. James Dudbridge argues for a proactive approach when reviewing companies’ commercial arrangements
Gift this article