South Africa: South Africa tax amendments become effective in 2017

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

South Africa: South Africa tax amendments become effective in 2017

foster.jpg

Dan Foster

Significant changes will enter into force in South Africa in 2017 after parliament approved the annual tax amendments in December 2016, some of which are discussed below.

Loans to trusts

To discourage avoidance of estate duty, the annual interest foregone on certain loans to trusts will, subject to certain exemptions, be treated as a donation made on the last day of the trust's tax year. This will apply after March 1 2017 to both existing and future loans.

Typically, such loans are used to purchase growth assets and cap the dutiable estate of the lender. The reference interest rate for this rule is the official rate of interest (8% on rand-denominated loans at present). Interest foregone below this rate will attract donations tax at 20% per year.

Loans to non-resident trusts by residents will, however, be excluded from the new deemed donation rule where such arrangements are subject to the transfer pricing provisions.

Employee share scheme dividends

Generally, local dividends are subject to a 15% withholding tax and foreign dividends are subject to an effective maximum income tax rate of 15%, whereas employee remuneration is subject to income tax of up to 41%.

Consequently, various anti-avoidance rules already exist to prevent the conversion of employee remuneration into dividends, typically via share schemes. These anti-avoidance rules will be extended further in 2017, with dividends received or accrued after March 1 2017 by or to employees in respect of certain equity instruments being taxed in full where such dividends arise from, or constitute, a share repurchase or redemption, or amounts derived on a company winding-up.

CFC group losses

South Africa imposes a sophisticated controlled foreign company (CFC) regime, subject to certain exemptions.

The so-called high tax exemption (HTE) applies to shield all income of the CFC from imputation to South Africa where the total foreign tax payable by the CFC is at least 75% of the notional South African tax that would have been due had the CFC been a South African tax resident.

The HTE foreign tax calculation requires losses other than the CFC's active year losses, including group losses, to be disregarded. The use by the CFC of such losses is effectively treated as foreign tax paid.

In this regard, it is important to note that South Africa does not operate a consolidated or group tax regime, but imposes corporate tax per entity.

Under the 2016 amendments, the HTE will be changed to delete the allowance of group losses so that where a CFC pays lower taxes in its jurisdiction as a result of group relief, only cash tax payable will be counted as foreign tax payable by the CFC. This amendment will proceed despite vociferous objections from practitioners and industry.

Consequently, a CFC that makes use of group loss relief in a foreign tax year commencing on or after March 1 2017 is extremely unlikely to qualify for the HTE, even though the tax rate in the foreign country may be similar to, or higher than, the tax rate in South Africa.

A CFC will still be able to disregard its own losses for purposes of the foreign tax calculation provided that such losses arose subsequent to the CFC becoming a CFC.

Dan Foster (dan.foster@webberwentzel.com)

Webber Wentzel

Tel: +27 11 530 5652

Website: www.webberwentzel.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The proposed Block TP Assessment could provide taxpayers with long-term arm’s-length price certainty and reduce admin headaches, Sanjay Sanghvi of Khaitan & Co writes
India’s budget changes goods and services tax rules; UK private school VAT challenge fast-tracked
It is understood that the US has vowed to oppose any outcome from talks taking place at the UN
It’s the second year in a row that RSM’s tax business has posted fee income growth above 10%
Recent guidance from the Indian tax authorities should provide confidence for investors, says Sanjay Sanghvi of Khaitan & Co
Grant Wardell-Johnson also suggests there could be solutions to the friction between the US and the OECD when it comes to pillar two
The president had so far avoided announcing tariffs on the US’s neighbours despite previous threats
The firm brought in three managing directors from EY and Deloitte in Europe; in other news, KPMG’s bid to practise law in US was delayed
One expert argues the ERS would be unlikely to improve taxpayers’ experience unless it comes with additional funding to hire more agents and staff
From pillar two and amount B to Apple’s headline EU Commission dispute, Martin Bonner and Yiwen Ping of Kreston Global argue that 2024’s key TP developments will inform 2025
Gift this article