Poland: Proposals will not allow investment cost deductions from operational revenue

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Poland: Proposals will not allow investment cost deductions from operational revenue

intl-updates-small.jpg
zamoyska.jpg

Magdalena Zamoyska

From 2018 Polish companies will not be allowed to deduct costs of their capital investment activity from operational revenue.

Currently, the Polish Corporate Income Tax Act does not provide for the obligation to calculate tax results separately on different forms of the taxpayers' operations. This means that, while defining taxable profit or loss, a given company should take into account all revenues and decrease them by the tax deductible cost of different types of its activity.

Planned changes to the Polish CIT Act introduce an obligation for the separate calculation of the tax result from capital gains. Capital gains are defined mainly as dividends, or dividends-like income, interest on profits from participating loans, revenues on the contributions in kind, disposal of shares and financial instruments but also the sale of receivables, even if receivables come from the operational activity.

The main motive to introduce separation of the tax result from capital gains is to prevail the unjustified decrease of operational profit by the cost of investment activity and financial operations, which according to the Polish Ministry of Development and Finance, may sometimes result from the non-genuine transactions aimed solely to decrease the taxable profit on the core business operations.

Starting from 2018, if a company earns profits on capital gains and operational activity, 19% CIT should be calculated on the sum of above profits (with exception to payment of dividends and dividends-like income, as in this case, tax is usually remitted by the distributor). If the company generates a loss on a given source of revenue in a tax year, this loss can only decrease profit from this source earned in the following years according to the rules outlined in CIT law.

At the date of writing this article, changes to the Polish CIT law are still a draft regulation subject to consultation. The amendments have been criticised because it is expected that they may discourage entrepreneurs from investment activity. On the other hand, the obligation to calculate the tax result for different types of revenue sources exists for many years in the Polish PIT Law. Additionally, this rule has been introduced to tax systems of numerous countries. However in Poland, the amendments are being introduced rapidly, without giving the companies sufficient time to adjust their operations and plans to the modified regulations.

Magdalena Zamoyska (magdalena.zamoyska@mddp.pl)

MDDP

Tel: +48 (22) 322 68 88

Website: www.mddp.pl

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The UK’s Labour government has an unpopular prime minister, an unpopular chancellor and not a lot of good options as it prepares to deliver its autumn Budget
Awards
The firms picked up five major awards between them at a gala ceremony held at New York’s prestigious Metropolitan Club
The streaming company’s operating income was $400m below expectations following the dispute; in other news, the OECD has released updates for 25 TP country profiles
Software company Oracle has won the right to have its A$250m dispute with the ATO stayed, paving the way for a mutual agreement procedure
If the US doesn't participate in pillar two then global consensus on the project can’t be a reality, tax academic René Matteotti also suggests
If it gets pillar two right, India may be the ideal country that finds a balance between its global commitments and its national interests, Sameer Sharma argues
As World Tax unveils its much-anticipated rankings for 2026, we focus on EMEA’s top performers in the first of three regional analyses
Firms are spending serious money to expand their tax advisory practices internationally – this proves that the tax practice is no mere sideshow
The controversial deal would ‘preserve the gains achieved under pillar two’, the OECD said; in other news, HMRC outlined its approach to dealing with ‘harmful’ tax advisers
Former EY and Deloitte tax specialists will staff the new operation, which provides the firm with new offices in Tokyo and Osaka
Gift this article