India: Draft notification on CbC reporting guidance released

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

India: Draft notification on CbC reporting guidance released

Sponsored by

logo.png
Draft notification on CbC reporting guidance released

The OECD guidelines, which were updated in July 2017 to incorporate Action Plan 13 of the BEPS project, provide a minimum requirement of maintaining a three-tiered documentation system.

The OECD guidelines, which were updated in July 2017 to incorporate Action Plan 13 of the BEPS project, provide a minimum requirement of maintaining a three-tiered documentation system. This involves maintaining the master file, local file and the country-by-country (CbC) report by multinational enterprises (MNEs). The main aim of introducing the three-tiered documentation process was to bring those MNEs into the tax net that took advantage by setting-up subsidiary companies in tax havens.

Keeping in line with the above changes, the Indian tax law was amended to include the maintenance of CbC reports and the master file. On October 6 2017, the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) released a draft notification for public comments setting out the guidelines for maintaining and furnishing transfer pricing documentation in the master file and CbC report. Comments on this notification could be submitted by stakeholders to the CBDT until October 16 2017.

The draft notification provides that the master file must be maintained by an entity if the following two conditions are satisfied:

  • The consolidated revenue of the international group for the accounting year preceding the previous year exceeds INR 5 billion ($76.5 million); and

  • The aggregate value of the international transactions during the reporting year either exceeds INR 500 million, or the purchase, sale, transfer, lease or use of intangible property exceeds INR 100 million.

By providing a lower threshold for maintenance of a master file, the Indian tax administration is attempting to bring even the small MNEs into its radar.

In comparison to the OECD guidelines, the draft notification provides for certain additional requirements in relation to maintenance of the master file. Further, it also introduces thresholds on providing certain other specific details, keeping in perspective the burden on the taxpayers on maintaining such documentation.

In the detailed master file, the taxpayer will be required to disclose details such as the organisational structure, international group's business and intangibles (including cost contribution agreements, principal research service and licensing agreements), intercompany financial activities and financial and tax positions. For constituent entities that do not satisfy the aforementioned thresholds, a limited master file is required to be maintained. Further, where more than one constituent entity of an international group is resident in India, then the international group is required to designate the constituent entity who will furnish the master file.

As regards to the maintenance of a CbC report, the draft notification provides that the requirement to furnish the same will be applicable only for those entities, where the revenue of the group to which the entity belongs, is in excess of INR 55 billion.

Dharawat

Rakesh Dharawat

 

rotti.jpg

Ajay Rotti

Rakesh Dharawat (rakesh.dharawat@dhruvaadvisors.com) and Ajay Rotti (ajay.rotti@dhruvaadvisors.com)

Dhruva Advisors LLP

Tel: +91 22 6108 1000

Website: www.dhruvaadvisors.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

They also warned against an ‘unnecessary duplication of efforts’ in UN tax convention negotiations; in other news, White & Case has hired Freshfields’ former French tax head
Awards
Submit your nominations to this year's WIBL EMEA Awards by 16 February 2026
Defending loss situations in TP is not about denying the existence of losses but about showing, through proactive measures, that the losses reflect genuine commercial realities
Further empowerment of HMRC enforcement has been praised, but the pre-Budget OBR leak was described as ‘shambolic’
Michel Braun of WTS Digital reviews ITR’s inaugural AI in tax event, and concludes that AI will enhance, not replace, the tax professional
The report is solid and balanced as it correctly underscores the ambitious institutional redesign that Brazil has undertaken in adopting a dual VAT model, experts tell ITR
The Brazilian law firm partner warns against going independent too early, considers the weight of political pressure, and tells ITR what makes tax cool
The lessons from Ireland are clear: selective, targeted, and credible fiscal incentives can unlock supply and investment
The ITR in-house award winner delves into his dramatic novelisation of tax transformation, and declares that 'tax doesn’t need AI right now'
Recent news of job cuts at EY is symptomatic of how the PwC controversy has tarnished the reputation of the entire ‘big four’
Gift this article