Chilean withholding tax of 35% on outbound payments for video games

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Chilean withholding tax of 35% on outbound payments for video games

Sponsored by

sponsored-firms-pwc.png
intl-updates

Bearing in mind that nowadays more than half of the population of the US plays video games and that live gaming events have been watched more than the NBA finals, the importance of the video game industry and its impact on the market has increased substantially during recent years.

Nearly 80% of the transactions in certain mobile app markets relate to video games.

It would be reasonable to expect, therefore, that governments would begin to show more interest in the taxation of the video game industry, which may, as we have mentioned, represent an important income flow for a country's treasury.

As regards the Chilean tax framework, the tax on an outbound payment in relation to video games depends on its qualification for legal purposes. Until now, the majority of local tax professionals were of the opinion that such a payment should be characterised as a payment for the use of standard software, which is exempted from Chilean withholding tax.

As far as standard software license is concerned, it is defined according to the usage rights that are provided, limiting them to only the relevant rights necessary for the use of the software program and not for other purposes, for example for the program's commercial exploitation, reproduction or modification.

However, a recent ruling of the Chilean Internal Revenue Service (IRS) stated the tax administration's opinion on the matter, establishing that the standard software exemption does not apply to payments sent overseas in relation to video games. This opinion was provided in the context of video games that are obtained from the internet, that can be used either by connecting to the internet or by downloading the games, with payment being made through a periodical subscription or through in-game payments in the context of free to play games.

In the IRS' view, video games consist of a set of instructions, images and sounds, with the purpose of obtaining entertainment and recreation, for use on computers or other devices. The IRS recognised that video games require a software support, but also deemed that the real nature of the transaction was not limited simply to an item of software. Rather, the IRS viewed it as a complex piece of work that involved artistic creation including concepts of an environment, characters, and history, with the intention of communicating ideas and allowing the interaction of the user with the virtual world and other users.

Hence, the IRS concluded that the payment for the provision of a video game should qualify as a payment for an entertainment and recreation service, falling under the generic taxable event of 'services rendered abroad', and subject to a 35% withholding tax. The foreign beneficiary of the payment and the local withholding agent are responsible for the payment of the said tax obligation.

The criterion on which the IRS based its ruling on this matter was not well received by the video game industry or by tax specialists. The fact that a video game could be considered as a service rather than as an intangible asset involving standard software appears rather outdated and not in line with prevailing views within the technology industry.

We do not expect that this discussion on the qualification of these and similar digital products will end any time soon. This is just a demonstration that technology moves faster than our local legislation, and there is still a lot of work to do in adapting the Chilean tax rules to the reality of this industry.

Astrid Schudeck and Gregorio Martínez

PwC

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The EU has seemingly capitulated to the US’s ‘side-by-side’ demands. This may be a win for the US, but the uncertainty has only just begun for pillar two
The £7.4m buyout marks MHA’s latest acquisition since listing on the London Stock Exchange earlier this year
ITR’s most prolific stories of the year charted public pillar two spats, the continued fallout from the PwC Australia tax leaks scandal, and a headline tax fraud trial
The climbdowns pave the way for a side-by-side deal to be concluded this week, as per the US Treasury secretary’s expectation; in other news, Taft added a 10-partner tax team
A vote to be held in 2026 could create Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, a $3.6bn giant with 3,100 lawyers across the Americas, EMEA and Asia Pacific
Foreign companies operating in Libya face source-based taxation even without a local presence. Multinationals must understand compliance obligations, withholding risks, and treaty relief to avoid costly surprises
Hotel La Tour had argued that VAT should be recoverable as a result of proceeds being used for a taxable business activity
Tax professionals are still going to be needed, but AI will make it easier than starting from zero, EY’s global tax disputes leader Luis Coronado tells ITR
AI and assisting clients with navigating global tax reform contributed to the uptick in turnover, the firm said
In a post on X, Scott Bessent urged dissenting countries to the US/OECD side-by-side arrangement to ‘join the consensus’ to get a deal over the line
Gift this article