Australia: MLI, hybrid mismatch, MITs and staple structures, cross-border financing and reduced company tax rate

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Australia: MLI, hybrid mismatch, MITs and staple structures, cross-border financing and reduced company tax rate

Sponsored by

Sponsored_Firms_piper.png
intl-updates-small.jpg

In recent weeks, we have seen important Australian tax developments that are relevant to multinationals and inbound investments. With many initiatives taking effect as early as January 1 2019, multinationals should consider the potential impact on their inbound and outbound Australian investments.



Legislation enabling the OECD's Multilateral Instrument

On August 24 2018, Australia enacted legislation that allows the OECD's Multilateral Instrument (MLI) to have force of law in Australia.

The MLI will have effect once ratification and diplomatic procedures are completed by Australia and each treaty country partner.

The MLI would implement the OECD's BEPS Action Plan into Australia's double tax treaties, subject to specific reservations expressed by the Australian government (such as those on specific permanent establishment articles).

In effect, the enabling legislation means that Australia's double tax treaties could be amended effective from as early as January 1 2019 (for example, for certain withholding taxes), subject to the formal procedures being completed.

Legislation for hybrid mismatch rules

On August 24 2018, Australia enacted its hybrid mismatch rules.

The rules implement BEPS Action 2, subject to Australian specific amendments. Specifically:

  • The rules apply to mismatches in Australian and foreign tax outcomes arising from a hybrid financial instrument, a hybrid payer, a reverse hybrid, a branch hybrid, a deducting hybrid an imported hybrid; and

  • In addition, the rules include a targeted integrity rule, which aims to prevent multinationals from bypassing the hybrid mismatch rules by using interposed country conduit type vehicles.

The rules will apply to income years starting on or after January 1 2019.

Managed investment trusts and stapled structures – integrity measures

On August 7 2018, the Australian government released further exposure draft legislation and explanatory materials affecting managed investment trusts (MITs) and stapled structures.

The further exposure draft legislation imposes a non-arm's length income rule and a statutory cap, which could apply to some cross-staple payments during the seven or 15-year transitional period in which a structure qualifies for the 15% concessional MIT withholding tax rate.

Cross-border financing

On August 1 2018, the Australian government and the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) released a number of materials relevant to cross-border financing:

  • Draft legislation and draft taxation determination TD 2018/D4, which in effect would require entities to value its assets and debt capital with their accounting values, for the purposes of Australia's thin capitalisation rules;

  • Draft legislation, which is intended to ensure that foreign controlled Australian consolidated entities and groups with foreign operations to be treated as both outward and inward investing entities, for the purposes of the thin capitalisation rules;

  • Draft taxation determination TD 2018/D5, which identifies the types of costs which are debt deductions that are subject to Australia's thin capitalisation rules; and

  • Updated practical compliance guideline PCG 2017/4 (the ATO's tax compliance guidelines on cross-border financing), which has been updated to include a draft schedule to set out specific risk indicators for related-party derivative arrangements that are used to hedge or manage the economic exposure of a company or group of companies.

New tests for reduced company tax rate

On August 31 2018, Australia enacted legislation that amends the qualifying rules for the reduced company tax rate.

In effect, a corporate tax entity will qualify for the lower company tax rate of 27.5% (rather than 30%) for an income year if:

  • No more than 80% of its assessable income for that income year is passive income; and

  • The aggregated turnover – of the corporate tax entity, its affiliates and its connected entities – is less than the aggregated turnover threshold (A$50 million for the 2018-19 income year) for that income year.

These changes apply from the 2017-2018 income year.

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

ITR’s most interesting stories of the year covered ‘landmark’ legal battles, pillar two, AI’s relationship with transfer pricing and more
Chinwe Odimba-Chapman was announced as Michael Bates’ successor; in other news, a report has found a high level of BEPS compliance among OECD jurisdictions
The tool, which will automatically compute amount B returns, requires “only minimal data inputs”, according to the OECD
The rules are intended to implement the substance of an earlier OECD report in its entirety
While new technology won’t replace the human touch, it could help relieve companies’ staffing issues, EY’s David Helmer and Daren Campbell tell ITR
The firm said the financial growth came from increased demand for its AI services and global tax reform advice
Chrystia Freeland had also been the figurehead of Canada’s controversial digital services tax adoption, which stoked economic tensions with the US
Panama has no official position on pillar two so far and a move to implement in Costa Rica will face rejection, experts tell ITR
The KPMG partner tells ITR about Sri Lanka’s complex and evolving tax landscape, setting legal precedents through client work, and his vision for the future of tax
Overall turnover at the firm also reached a record £8 billion; in other news, Ashurst and Dentons announced senior tax partner hires
Gift this article