Russia: Russia to ratify the multilateral instrument on BEPS

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Russia: Russia to ratify the multilateral instrument on BEPS

Sponsored by

sponsored-firms-kpmg.png
intl-updates-small.jpg

Russia signed the Multilateral Convention to Implement Tax Related Measures to Prevent BEPS (multilateral instrument, or MLI) on June 7 2017.

Russia signed the Multilateral Convention to Implement Tax Related Measures to Prevent BEPS (multilateral instrument, or MLI) on June 7 2017.

Russia is now planning to ratify the multilateral instrument, having drafted a ratification law.

Russia has included 71 of the 84 agreements on the avoidance of double taxation (DTAs) listed by the MLI. However, the draft law on ratification does not cover new DTAs such as the Russia-Japan DTA, or DTAs to be concluded such as the Russia-Sweden DTA.

Remarkably, Russia does not intend to include Germany (which is a major EU trading partner), or Switzerland (where many Russian groups have headquarters and trading companies) on its list.

One of the key provisions Russia has chosen to implement is the simplified limitation on benefits (S-LoB) test. This is rarely chosen by countries signing the MLI, most of which prefer the principal purpose test (PPT test). The list of countries using S-LoB is rather short, but includes Greece, Iceland, India, and Kazakhstan, among others.

Even if a treaty partner has not chosen to implement the S-LoB test, there is already a fairly strict domestic beneficial ownership (BO) test in place to check the eligibility of foreign companies to use a treaty to receive Russian-sourced income. The tests overlap, and in certain cases, the BO requirements are far more stringent than those in S-LoB.

Additionally, over the past decade, Russia has consistently changed its DTAs in order to re-allocate taxation rights to capital gains derived from the sale of Russian property-rich companies back to Russia. In line with this, Russia has included this right in its MLI position.

However, only a small number of treaties will be amended (e.g. Italy and Turkey), whereas many others will remain untouched, such as the Russia-Netherlands DTA, despite lots of Russian real estate being held through Dutch holding companies.

These are some of the noteworthy examples regarding Russia's MLI position. There are many more provisions which should be thoroughly reviewed and analysed in light of MLI ratification in Russia.

It is expected that if ratification occurs in 2019, the MLI may take effect from January 1 2020. Therefore, the available time to adapt to structures in the MLI is shrinking, and immediate action may be needed in order to have sufficient time to undertake restructuring where necessary.

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The OECD has vowed to continue working with the US despite the president effectively pulling the country out of the organisation’s global minimum tax deal
Norton Rose Fulbright highlights a Brazilian investment fund as a practical example of how new Dutch tax rules will require significant attention from foreign companies
Thomson Reuters now has ‘end-to-end capability’ for its tax workflow business, according to its president for tax accounting and audit professionals
Patrick O’Gara, who is rated as a ‘highly regarded practitioner’ by World Tax, had spent over 20 years at Baker McKenzie
If approved, it would become the first ‘big four’ firm to practise law in the US; in other news, Morrison Foerster hired a new global tax co-chair
The ‘birth date’ of the service, which will collect tariffs, duties and other foreign revenue, will be January 20
Awards
Submit your nominations to this year's WIBL Americas Awards by February 28
Awards
Research for the annual Women in Business Law Awards has begun – submit your entries by February 28
In-house counsel across a number of regions are unimpressed with their tax advisers’ CSR efforts, according to ITR+ research
Firms are starkly divided on the benefits of specialist tax litigation teams over generalist practices, ITR’s analysis also finds
Gift this article