Switzerland: Swiss corporate tax reform to be subject to a referendum

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Switzerland: Swiss corporate tax reform to be subject to a referendum

Sponsored by

Sponsored_Firms_deloitte.png
intl-updates-small.jpg

Switzerland's Tax Reform and AHV Financing Bill (TRAF, formerly known as Swiss Tax Reform 17 and Swiss Corporate Tax Reform III) will officially be subject to a referendum, as a largely left wing alliance made up of junior green and socialist parties has secured more than 50,000 signatures against the proposed law. The public vote is now scheduled for May 19 2019.

Sunset of all special Swiss corporate tax regimes

Under the reform, all special Swiss corporate tax regimes such as the mixed company, the holding company, the domiciliary company, the principal company (governed by Federal Circular Letter No. 8), and the finance branch regime, are likely scheduled to sunset from January 1 2020. These regimes will be replaced with measures that are both internationally accepted and that ensure Switzerland will remain attractive for multinational companies.

Transitional rules for sunsetting regimes

The sunset of these special tax regimes is subject to transitional rules. These rules should enable companies benefitting from such regimes to maintain their existing level of taxation by way of a special release of hidden reserves for another five years after the sunset of the regimes from January 1 2020, depending on their specific facts and circumstances.

Main replacement measures for corporate taxpayers

  • Reduction of general tax rates: at the discretion of the individual cantons, where the majority of cantons will be in the 13–14% tax rate range (effectively combined federal/cantonal/communal tax rate, ETR) with some cantons with an ETR as low as 12%, such as Zug, Schwyz and Lucerne;

  • Introduction of a patent box: following the so-called modified nexus approach by the OECD on a cantonal level, with a tax relief for qualifying incomes of up to 90%;

  • Introduction of a R&D super-deduction: at the cantonal level, up to a maximum of 150% of the effective qualifying expenses;

  • Step-up on migration of a company, or of activities and functions to Switzerland: A step-up would be allowed for direct federal and cantonal/communal tax purposes (including on self-created goodwill) for companies or additional activities and functions migrating to Switzerland;

  • Reduction of the cantonal/communal annual capital tax: in relation to participations, patented intellectual property, and intercompany loans at the discretion of the individual cantons; and

  • Cantons with a 'high' cantonal tax rate may introduce a notional interest deduction (NID) on a cantonal level: This may only benefit the canton of Zurich and potentially very few additional selective cantons with high enough tax rates.

The bill is well supported by almost all of the relevant stakeholders ranging from business associations to unions and the whole political party spectrum, including the major left wing parties, who were formerly critical of the reform. We therefore currently deem the odds to be more likely than not that the bill will be confirmed in the public vote. However, the decision will be with the Swiss voter.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

While pillar two can progress without the US, it won’t reach the same heights without American involvement, argues Renáta Bláhová, founding partner of BMB Partners Taxand
There are unanswered questions as to how foreign investors could reclaim money via tax credits, advisers suggested
Amid an ever-changing tax environment, India’s advisory market is bustling with competition ahead of the 2025 World Tax rankings and ITR Awards
The deal comes after PwC had accused Paul McNab of using confidential information; in other news, McDermott hired a new London tax head from a US rival
Looking at transfer pricing simplification is “obviously helpful”, but it should be done in line with current standards, a senior government figure reportedly said
The UK Government’s plans to close the tax gap via increased HM Revenue and Customs investment have failed to impress local tax advisers
Under the merged scheme for R&D tax relief introduced last year, rules on contracted out R&D have changed. James Dudbridge argues for a proactive approach when reviewing companies’ commercial arrangements
Cultural nuances could account for tax advisers’ perceived poor cost management, a local partner told ITR
Updated rules represent a significant shift in the Luxembourg TP landscape and emphasise the need for robust arm’s-length calculations, says Vanessa Ramos Ferrin of TransFair Pricing Solutions
KPMG Law US revolves around contract managed services and the US is the largest market for that, Stuart Bedford tells ITR in an exclusive interview
Gift this article