Hong Kong introduces an enhanced R&D tax incentive

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Hong Kong introduces an enhanced R&D tax incentive

intl-updates

In a bid to encourage more research and development (R&D) activities being carried out in Hong Kong, the Hong Kong government has proposed a super R&D tax deduction which will commence from the year of assessment 2018/19, if enacted.

The bill contains complex and rather vague definitions as to which activities qualify for the super tax deduction.

Under existing rules, taxpayers only qualify for a 100% tax deduction on any R&D expenditure incurred to its business, subject to satisfying certain conditions. The R&D expenditure must be incurred in respect of R&D activities undertaken by the taxpayer itself or paid to an approved research institution.

The bill, however, broadly classifies R&D expenditure in two broad categories (Type A and Type B expenditures) that are deductible subject to meeting certain conditions. Type A qualifies for a basic 100% tax deduction. It is Type B expenditure that qualifies for the enhanced two-tiered tax deduction (300% tax deduction for the first HK$2 million ($255,000) and 200% for the remaining amount).

The critical element to qualify for Type B expenditure is that the R&D activity is wholly undertaken in Hong Kong and is one of the following:

  • An activity in the fields of natural or applied science to extend knowledge;

  • Any original and planned investigation undertaken with the prospect of gaining new scientific or technical knowledge and understanding; or

  • The application of any research finding or other knowledge to a plan or design for producing or introducing new or substantially improved materials, devices, products, processes, systems or services before they are commercially produced or used.

However, the bill excludes certain activities from qualifying as Type B expenditure, including:

  • Any efficiency survey, feasibility study, management study, market research or sales promotion;

  • The application of any publicly available research findings or other knowledge to a plan or design, with an anticipated outcome and without any scientific or technological uncertainty;

  • Any activity that does not seek to directly contribute to achieving an advance in science or technology by resolving scientific or technological uncertainty; or

  • Any work to develop the non-scientific or non-technological aspect of a new or substantially improved material device, product, process, system or service.

In order for expenditure on a qualifying R&D activity to qualify for the super tax deduction, it must be incurred in relation to the taxpayer's business and must be:

  • Paid to a designated local research institution; or

  • Paid to a designated local research institution which has, as an object, the undertaking of a qualifying R&D activity related to the class of business to which the taxpayer's business belongs, where the payment is used for pursuing that object; or

  • An expenditure in relation to: (i) an employee engaged directly and actively in a qualifying R&D activity; or (ii) a consumable item that is used directly in a qualifying R&D activity.

Again, there are some key exclusions where no R&D deduction is allowed. This includes where the R&D expenditure is undertaken for another person, any rights generated from the R&D activity are not fully vested in the person, or the costs are met by the government or another person.

This is another welcome tax incentive that will provide Hong Kong with a competitive advantage in promoting R&D activities to be carried out in Hong Kong. There are, however, potentially onerous and complex conditions that need to be satisfied in order to qualify for the super tax deduction.

In our experience, many companies will find that they are conducting quality R&D activities as part of their product and process improvement activities. To ensure that they are in a position to claim the new benefit, it will be vital that they have the systems and processes in place to correctly identify projects and classify their R&D expenditure.

lu-lewis.jpg

ng

Lewis Lu

Curtis Ng




Lewis Lu (lewis.lu@kpmg.com) and Curtis Ng (curtis.ng@kpmg.com)

KPMG China

Tel: +86 (21) 2212 3421

Website:www.kpmg.com/cn

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

As the firm embarks on a major shakeup of its EMEA partnerships, some staff will be watching nervously
The buyout of Hucke and Associates continues Ryan’s streak of firm acquisitions; in other news, a UK appeal against VAT on private school fees was dismissed
Tax teams are responding to usual client demand in the region, albeit with increased working from home flexibility, local sources indicate
A 120-plus-day delay to refunds would cost taxpayers almost $3bn in additional interest, the Cato Institute warned; plus indirect tax updates from February
The Office for Budget Responsibility’s pessimistic pillar two forecast accompanied the UK chancellor’s muted Spring Statement, dubbed ‘as dull as possible’ by one adviser
Digital tax reform is dissolving the old ‘temporal buffer’, forcing systems, institutions, and professionals to adapt as real-time reporting reshapes governance, capability, and compliance
Our first instalment features analysis of Deloitte’s landmark EMEA merger, Donald Trump’s Supreme Court tariff showdown and Venezuela’s tax evolution
While some believe it could have a positive effect on the wider advisory landscape, others argue that HMRC’s ‘red tape’ exercise won’t deter bad actors
The political optics of the US’s carve-out deal are poor, but as the Fair Tax Foundation’s Paul Monaghan writes, it preserves pillar two’s guiding ethos
The big four firm reportedly sent ‘threatening’ correspondence to Unity Advisory over its hiring of ex-PwC partners; plus tax recruitment news from the week
Gift this article