European Union: Public country-by-country reporting in the EU off the tracks, for now

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

European Union: Public country-by-country reporting in the EU off the tracks, for now

Sponsored by

sponsored-firms-pwc.png
intl-updates-small.jpg

During a debate at the European Parliament in mid-April 2018, a representative from the Council of the European Union confirmed to members of the European Parliament (MEPs) that there were "unresolved political issues" which prevented agreement at the council on the European Commission's April 2016 pending proposal for public country-by-country reporting (public CbCR). The two largest parties in the European Parliament, the EPP (Christian Democrats) and the S&D (Social Democrats), asked the council to unblock the negotiations on the proposal for public CbCR. This was generally understood to be the last chance to reach a deal as Austria, which holds the six-monthly rotating EU Council presidency from July 1 to December 31 2018, and could drive discussions in the council forward, is not in favour of the commission's proposal. Germany's new Federal Finance Minister Olaf Scholz said in June 2018 that the German government needed more time and he also counselled caution about the Commission's proposal and hinted at following a tax-centric approach instead.

Indeed, one of the thorniest political issues surrounding the Commission's protracted 2016 draft directive is its legal base, which has divided the EU's member states as well as the EU's institutions from the start. Both the legal services of the European Parliament and the European Commission have taken the formal view that there is no conflict in the Commission's choice of the legal basis for its proposal, since the draft public CbCR directive in their opinion is a tax transparency financial reporting tool, and not a fiscal matter as such, which would require unanimity voting in the Council (giving each of the EU-28 individual member states a right to veto the proposal). The Council's legal service however does not agree with its counterparts at the Parliament and the Commission.

Members of the European Parliament have expressed their discontent with the now prolonged impasse around public CbCR, arguing that some EU member states are using the legal basis issue as a pretext to delay any meaningful negotiations on this file.

EU Tax Commissioner Pierre Moscovici indicated in April 2018 that a deal would probably not be reached within the Juncker Commission's mandate which ends on October 31 2019.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Kingsley Napley’s claimants are arguing that taxing the provision of education breaches the European Convention on Human Rights
While pillar two can progress without the US, it won’t reach the same heights without American involvement, argues Renáta Bláhová, founding partner of BMB Partners Taxand
There are unanswered questions as to how foreign investors could reclaim money via tax credits, advisers suggested
Amid an ever-changing tax environment, India’s advisory market is bustling with competition ahead of the 2025 World Tax rankings and ITR Awards
The deal comes after PwC had accused Paul McNab of using confidential information; in other news, McDermott hired a new London tax head from a US rival
Looking at transfer pricing simplification is “obviously helpful”, but it should be done in line with current standards, a senior government figure reportedly said
The UK Government’s plans to close the tax gap via increased HM Revenue and Customs investment have failed to impress local tax advisers
Under the merged scheme for R&D tax relief introduced last year, rules on contracted out R&D have changed. James Dudbridge argues for a proactive approach when reviewing companies’ commercial arrangements
Cultural nuances could account for tax advisers’ perceived poor cost management, a local partner told ITR
Updated rules represent a significant shift in the Luxembourg TP landscape and emphasise the need for robust arm’s-length calculations, says Vanessa Ramos Ferrin of TransFair Pricing Solutions
Gift this article