European Union: EU targets 92 non-EU jurisdictions as potential tax havens

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

European Union: EU targets 92 non-EU jurisdictions as potential tax havens

made.jpg

Bob van der Made

EU member states sent a letter on February 1 2017 to 92 jurisdictions outside the European Union, informing them that they will be "screened" with a view to possible inclusion in a future EU "blacklist" of tax havens. According to the EU's tax policy calendar, the common EU blacklist should be ready by the end of 2017, which, given the task, seems quite ambitious.

The list of the 92 countries or jurisdictions that have been contacted is not public, but it is believed that the US or a couple of individual US states may have received a letter as well. The template for the letter signed by the Chair of the Code of Conduct Group on Business Taxation (the Code Group) was leaked. In the letter, EU member states ask the recipients for main country contacts details and to cooperate with the EU. The letter insists that this first contact does not mean that the 92 countries will also end up on the EU's final list.

EU member states' experts will soon be nominated in the context of the Code of Conduct Group as part of several country case-handling teams that will have to examine the 92 countries. The Code Group will possibly need to engage in a "dialogue" with each of the 92 countries to decide in the coming months whether they should be included in the final blacklist.

The European Commission finalised its work on a draft EU tax haven blacklist on September 14 2016, or "Scoreboard of all third countries and jurisdictions for tax purposes (scoreboard)". The European Commission's scoreboard pre-assessed 160 non-EU jurisdictions against "objective economic, financial, stability and tax good governance indicators". The Commission presented the scoreboard on September 15 2016. It is understood that the EU's 28 member states (Council) were informed of the scoreboard's publication only at a very late stage. However, importantly, the primary and formal responsible EU body for the EU screening process is actually the EU's Code Group, not the EU's Commission. To complicate matters further, the Code Group is not a formal EU body or EU/ECOFIN Council working group as such, but it is an informal, political peer pressure group made up of the EU's member states.

On November 8 2016, the EU's ECOFIN Council (made up of the EU's 28 finance ministers) agreed that to avoid being on the future EU tax haven blacklist, third countries would have to comply with the international tax transparency criteria, fair taxation – including not facilitating offshore structures or arrangements aimed at attracting profits that do not reflect real economic activity in the jurisdiction, and implementation of anti-BEPS measures such as the common reporting standard. The work is being carried out in parallel with the OECD's Global Forum on Transparency and Exchange of Information for Tax Purposes.

Malta's Finance Minister Edward Scicluna, who is the chair of the ECOFIN Council as part of Malta's six-month rotating EU Council Presidency, told a press conference on February 21 2017 after the ECOFIN Council meeting that: "There is no list at present whatsoever. What we have is a number of letters being sent to a number of jurisdictions asking them to engage with the EU in order to start discussions. … Our aim is simple, to promote worldwide good standards that are already applicable in the European Union".

Bob van der Made (bob.van.der.made@nl.pwc.com)

PwC EU Public Affairs-Brussels

Tel: +31 6 130 96 296

Website: www.pwc.com/eudtg

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The ruling is ‘well-structured’ in its references to the OECD TP guidelines, one expert says, while another argues it overlooks key technical issues
India also brokered its first-ever multilateral APA last year, the Central Board of Taxes announced
A global tax framework may not materialise anytime soon, but a common set of principles is becoming increasingly necessary, Rudolf Winkenius also tells ITR
Kingsley Napley’s claimants are arguing that taxing the provision of education breaches the European Convention on Human Rights
While pillar two can progress without the US, it won’t reach the same heights without American involvement, argues Renáta Bláhová, founding partner of BMB Partners Taxand
There are unanswered questions as to how foreign investors could reclaim money via tax credits, advisers suggested
Amid an ever-changing tax environment, India’s advisory market is bustling with competition ahead of the 2025 World Tax rankings and ITR Awards
The deal comes after PwC had accused Paul McNab of using confidential information; in other news, McDermott hired a new London tax head from a US rival
Looking at transfer pricing simplification is “obviously helpful”, but it should be done in line with current standards, a senior government figure reportedly said
The UK Government’s plans to close the tax gap via increased HM Revenue and Customs investment have failed to impress local tax advisers
Gift this article