Norway: Alterations of the Norwegian tonnage tax regime

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Norway: Alterations of the Norwegian tonnage tax regime

intl-updates-small.jpg
ragna.jpg

Ragna Flækøy Skjåkødegård

The Ministry of Finance recently published its letter of notification of the tonnage tax regime to the EFTA Surveillance Agency (ESA), outlining the following alterations in the existing tonnage tax regime:

Bareboat chartering out

The following restrictions/alterations are introduced for bareboat chartering out:

  • Bareboat chartering out is limited to 50% of the total tonnage of the company group's fleet within the tonnage tax regime during an income year. The Ministry of Finance suggest that there should be an option to measure the bareboat chartered out fleet over a period of four years.

  • Bareboat charters must not exceed a contractual period of 5 (+3) years, i.e. five years with the option to extend for three years. Bareboat contracts exceeding 5+3 years will thus constitute disqualifying assets.

  • Strategical management of all vessels chartered out on bareboat terms must be performed from within the EEA.

The Ministry states that intra-group bareboat chartering out will be allowed "unconditionally". There are no limitations introduced for chartering in on bareboat terms.

The limitations are, as a starting point, applicable to new bareboat chartering out contracts. Tonnage chartered out on existing contracts, including options to extend for up to three years, will not be included in the limitation introduced. However, this transitional rule will not apply to what the Ministry calls "long-term contracts", defined as contracts of a duration of more than five years. Long-term contracts will thus be disqualifying for the tonnage tax regime.

Voyage charter/time charter

The Ministry notifies a limitation of 90% on the chartering in of non-EEA flagged vessels on time charter or voyage charter terms. Any limitations will be measured on a yearly basis, but counting the tonnage chartered out for each day of the year. The tonnage will be measured on a company group level. The limitation will only apply to new chartering in contracts.

Inclusion of windmill farm vessels

The Ministry of Finance notifies that vessels involved with construction, maintenance, repair and disassembly of windmills at sea are qualifying for the tonnage tax regime. Up to now, the windmill farm vessels have only constituted qualifying assets to the tonnage tax regime if they have been used in transportation assignments. The extension is notified to take effect from January 1 2017, and the extension was adopted by the Parliament in December 2016, but is awaiting the approval from ESA.

The extension does not comprise windmill farm vessels operating in Norwegian internal waters or Norwegian territorial waters.

Exclusion of vessels not being self-propelled and operating in foreign inland waterways

The Ministry of Finance also notifies that vessels that are not self-propelled and operating mainly in foreign inland waterways should not qualify for the tonnage tax regime. Vessels that are not self-propelled and operating mainly in Norwegian waterways are disqualifying according the current tonnage tax regime.

Except for the extension regarding windmill farm vessels, the alterations are planned to take effect from July 1 2017.

Ragna Flækøy Skjåkødegård (rskjakodegard@deloitte.no), Oslo

Deloitte

Tel: +47 23 27 96 00

Website: www.deloitte.no

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

While pillar two can progress without the US, it won’t reach the same heights without American involvement, argues Renáta Bláhová, founding partner of BMB Partners Taxand
There are unanswered questions as to how foreign investors could reclaim money via tax credits, advisers suggested
Amid an ever-changing tax environment, India’s advisory market is bustling with competition ahead of the 2025 World Tax rankings and ITR Awards
The deal comes after PwC had accused Paul McNab of using confidential information; in other news, McDermott hired a new London tax head from a US rival
Looking at transfer pricing simplification is “obviously helpful”, but it should be done in line with current standards, a senior government figure reportedly said
The UK Government’s plans to close the tax gap via increased HM Revenue and Customs investment have failed to impress local tax advisers
Under the merged scheme for R&D tax relief introduced last year, rules on contracted out R&D have changed. James Dudbridge argues for a proactive approach when reviewing companies’ commercial arrangements
Cultural nuances could account for tax advisers’ perceived poor cost management, a local partner told ITR
Updated rules represent a significant shift in the Luxembourg TP landscape and emphasise the need for robust arm’s-length calculations, says Vanessa Ramos Ferrin of TransFair Pricing Solutions
KPMG Law US revolves around contract managed services and the US is the largest market for that, Stuart Bedford tells ITR in an exclusive interview
Gift this article