Italy: Companies migrating to Italy: New ‘internationalisation’ decree introduces rules to determine assets and liabilities’ tax basis

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Italy: Companies migrating to Italy: New ‘internationalisation’ decree introduces rules to determine assets and liabilities’ tax basis

Foglia-Giuliano
Emma-Marco

Giuliano Foglia

Marco Emma

The 'internationalisation' decree (formally, legislative decree No 147 of September 14 2015) has been recently published on the Official Gazette and is now effective.

The decree introduced different measures aimed at removing uncertainties and providing a more definite and stable tax legal framework, with a view to attracting foreign investors. Above all, the decree introduced, for the first time, a clear provision in relation to the corporate income tax effects for foreign companies migrating to Italy. Italian tax law did not previously cover such case.

According to article 12 of the decree, the transfer of tax residence from a white-list country to Italy involves the step-up of the tax basis of foreign company's assets and liabilities at fair market value, regardless of the application of an 'exit tax' in the state from which assets are transferred. In case of 'inbound' migration from a non-white listed country, the above mentioned step up is subject to the conclusion of an international ruling (APA) with the Italian tax authorities. If no ruling is obtained, the 'non-white list' company shall assume the lower between the acquisition cost, the book value or the market value as tax basis of the assets 'relocated' to Italy, while the tax basis of the liabilities will be the higher among such values.

Such provision, effective from fiscal year 2015, represents an impressive step forward, compared with the previous situation of uncertainty. Due to the lack of any provision in this respect, in fact, it was widely debated before the internationalisation decree whether transferred assets had to be valuated according (i) to the market value or alternatively (ii) to the acquisition cost method. Even if the market value principle seems to prevail (as implicitly confirmed now by the new decree), the Italian Revenue Agency occasionally took the position that the tax step up of assets relocated to Italy was allowed only provided that the state from which the assets were transferred applied an 'exit tax'. Difficulties arose where an exit tax in principle applied but a specific exemption regime was granted by the exit state on certain assets (for example, the participation exemption regime).

In this context, not only does the new provision fill a legislative gap in the Italian tax framework, but it also represents an alluring occasion for foreign investors to step up the tax basis of their assets.

Interesting tax opportunities, in particular, may arise in relation to intellectual properties held by non-Italian resident companies from the combination of the new 'inbound' migration step up possibility with the partial corporate income tax exemption available under the new Italian Patent Box regime. In a nutshell, the Patent Box allows a 50% corporate income tax exemption in relation to income deriving from direct or indirect use of certain IP rights (currently including commercial trademarks). Such optional regime applies, under certain circumstances, on the basis of the ratio of a) R&D expenses borne to maintain, increase and develop the intangible asset, and to b) total expenses sustained for the creation of such IP right.

Giuliano Foglia (foglia@virtax.it) and Marco Emma (emma@virtax.it)

Tremonti Vitali Romagnoli Piccardi e Associati

Tel: +39 06 3218022 (Rome); +39 02 58313707 (Milan)

Website: www.virtax.it

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Kingsley Napley’s claimants are arguing that taxing the provision of education breaches the European Convention on Human Rights
While pillar two can progress without the US, it won’t reach the same heights without American involvement, argues Renáta Bláhová, founding partner of BMB Partners Taxand
There are unanswered questions as to how foreign investors could reclaim money via tax credits, advisers suggested
Amid an ever-changing tax environment, India’s advisory market is bustling with competition ahead of the 2025 World Tax rankings and ITR Awards
The deal comes after PwC had accused Paul McNab of using confidential information; in other news, McDermott hired a new London tax head from a US rival
Looking at transfer pricing simplification is “obviously helpful”, but it should be done in line with current standards, a senior government figure reportedly said
The UK Government’s plans to close the tax gap via increased HM Revenue and Customs investment have failed to impress local tax advisers
Under the merged scheme for R&D tax relief introduced last year, rules on contracted out R&D have changed. James Dudbridge argues for a proactive approach when reviewing companies’ commercial arrangements
Cultural nuances could account for tax advisers’ perceived poor cost management, a local partner told ITR
Updated rules represent a significant shift in the Luxembourg TP landscape and emphasise the need for robust arm’s-length calculations, says Vanessa Ramos Ferrin of TransFair Pricing Solutions
Gift this article