Norway: Ministry of Finance issues exceptions to interest deduction limitation rules

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Norway: Ministry of Finance issues exceptions to interest deduction limitation rules

li.jpg

saastad.jpg

Wensing Li


Rolf Saastad

Norway's Ministry of Finance issued regulations on April 24 2014 that set out certain exceptions to the application of the interest deduction limitation rules that were adopted in 2013. The new regulations apply as from January 1 2014, that is, for the same period as the interest deduction limitation rules in general. The general rules primarily limit the deduction of interest expense on related party debt, but also will capture interest on third-party debt if a related party provided security for the debt.

The newly-issued regulations exempt the following securities provided by related parties:

  • Security provided by a company or entity that is at least 50% owned or controlled directly or indirectly by the borrower; and

  • Security in the form of a pledge of shares or loan notes issued by the borrower.

If the loan falls within one of these exceptions, interest expense on the external loan will be fully deductible for the borrower, regardless of the security granted by the related party.

The main features of the interest deduction limitation rules are as follows:

  • Interest deductibility on related party debt is non-deductible in a year to the extent the net interest expense exceeds 30% of tax EBITDA (earnings before interest, tax depreciation and amortisation), subject to certain adjustments.

  • The term related party for the purposes of the rules means direct or indirect ownership or control of at least 50% of a debtor. Related parties may be resident in Norway or abroad.

  • The limitation rules apply once the net interest expense exceeds a threshold of NOK 5 million ($850,000).

  • The limitation is calculated on an entity-by-entity basis, so a consolidated group approach is not available.

  • Net interest expense in excess of the limitation may be carried forward for 10 years, provided the expense falls within the 30% limitation for the relevant years.

  • External loans that are guaranteed by a related party will be considered internal debt and, therefore, will fall within the scope of the rules, except:

  • Security provided by a company or entity that is at least 50% owned or controlled directly or indirectly by the borrower; and

  • Security in the form of a pledge of shares or loan notes issued by the borrower.

  • Tax losses carried forward and group contributions are not deductible if the tax base before the limitation for deducting the net interest expense is negative or zero. If an interest deduction is disallowed, the taxpayer could have a positive tax base and tax payable even though it has tax losses carried forward.

  • Even if the deduction of interest is limited at the level of a borrower, the interest is taxable for the related party lender.

Wensing Li (wensli@deloitte.no) and Rolf Saastad (rsaastad@deloitte.no), Oslo

Deloitte

Tel: +47 23 27 98 36

Website: www.deloitteadvokatfirma.no

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The OECD’s mínimum tax rules are set to affect M&A deals in several ways, says Osborne Clarke partner Esther Villa
The EU is preparing countermeasures to protect its interests, Ursula von der Leyen said; in other news, the NRA is suing the state of Colorado over a 6.5% tax on the sale of firearms
The ruling is ‘well-structured’ in its references to the OECD TP guidelines, one expert says, while another argues it overlooks key technical issues
India also brokered its first-ever multilateral APA last year, the Central Board of Taxes announced
A global tax framework may not materialise anytime soon, but a common set of principles is becoming increasingly necessary, Rudolf Winkenius also tells ITR
Kingsley Napley’s claimants are arguing that taxing the provision of education breaches the European Convention on Human Rights
While pillar two can progress without the US, it won’t reach the same heights without American involvement, argues Renáta Bláhová, founding partner of BMB Partners Taxand
There are unanswered questions as to how foreign investors could reclaim money via tax credits, advisers suggested
Amid an ever-changing tax environment, India’s advisory market is bustling with competition ahead of the 2025 World Tax rankings and ITR Awards
The deal comes after PwC had accused Paul McNab of using confidential information; in other news, McDermott hired a new London tax head from a US rival
Gift this article