Mexico: New miscellaneous rules introduce additional flexibility on the Mexican maquila regime

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Mexico: New miscellaneous rules introduce additional flexibility on the Mexican maquila regime

cuellar.jpg

salagaray.jpg

David Cuellar


Cesar Salagaray

The 2014 tax reform introduced significant changes and restrictions on the Mexican maquila income tax regime, one of which is the requirement that the income from operating activities must derive exclusively from maquila operations. Under the former rules, many multinational entities (MNEs) opted to structure their operations in a way that the maquila entity carried out certain activities that could be considered as auxiliary to the production activity itself, such as the lease of space (real estate) or assets to other group entities, rendering employee services, disposal of scrap or limited distribution of certain goods.

Considering the new rules in force since January 1 2014, many multinationals operating under these type of combined structures could have lost the benefits set forth by article 181 of the Mexican Income Tax Law as a consequence of the income derived from non-maquila auxiliary activities.

However, on July 1 2014, the Mexican tax authorities published a new amendment to the Mexican miscellaneous rules in force for 2014 and among other changes, introduced certain clarifications and changes to the current maquila regime through rule I.3.19.1.

In general terms, the new miscellaneous rules provide additional flexibility allowing Mexican Maquiladora companies to carry out certain "complementary" activities as part of their "productive income" without jeopardising their maquila status. The complementary activities allowed for maquila companies could be summarised as follows:

  • Employee services (lease of personnel);

  • Leasing/sale of movable and real estate property;

  • Disposal of scrap produced by maquila operations;

  • Interest income; and

  • Other income related to the maquila operations, except for sales of finished goods.

These new rules and the permitted complementary activities may avoid the need for certain multinationals that were carrying out combined maquila activities to restructure their operations or even losing the maquila regime, within the rules, the Maquiladora company must comply with the following requirements:

  • The total of this other income should not exceed 10% of the total income from the maquila operations;

  • In the case of personnel leasing, the employees should be provided only to related parties;

  • Additional information filing requirements (consisting basically in providing segmented information regarding the complementary activities);

  • To file a notification in case of the sale of movable and real estate property.

These regulations will become effective on October 1 2014. Meanwhile, Maquiladoras can continue to consider that their total income qualifies as derived from their maquila activity, if and only if they maintain accounting records that allow differentiation between each type of income and associated costs and expenses.

David Cuellar (david.cuellar@mx.pwc.com) and Cesar Salagaray (cesar.salagaray@mx.pwc.com)

PwC

Tel: +52 55 5263 5816

Fax: +52 55 5263 6010

Website: www.pwc.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Kingsley Napley’s claimants are arguing that taxing the provision of education breaches the European Convention on Human Rights
While pillar two can progress without the US, it won’t reach the same heights without American involvement, argues Renáta Bláhová, founding partner of BMB Partners Taxand
There are unanswered questions as to how foreign investors could reclaim money via tax credits, advisers suggested
Amid an ever-changing tax environment, India’s advisory market is bustling with competition ahead of the 2025 World Tax rankings and ITR Awards
The deal comes after PwC had accused Paul McNab of using confidential information; in other news, McDermott hired a new London tax head from a US rival
Looking at transfer pricing simplification is “obviously helpful”, but it should be done in line with current standards, a senior government figure reportedly said
The UK Government’s plans to close the tax gap via increased HM Revenue and Customs investment have failed to impress local tax advisers
Under the merged scheme for R&D tax relief introduced last year, rules on contracted out R&D have changed. James Dudbridge argues for a proactive approach when reviewing companies’ commercial arrangements
Cultural nuances could account for tax advisers’ perceived poor cost management, a local partner told ITR
Updated rules represent a significant shift in the Luxembourg TP landscape and emphasise the need for robust arm’s-length calculations, says Vanessa Ramos Ferrin of TransFair Pricing Solutions
Gift this article