Romania: Tax incentives introduced in 2014

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Romania: Tax incentives introduced in 2014

sincu.jpg

Gabriel Sincu

The Romanian economy has a great need for new investments to fulfil its huge growth potential. Whether direct or indirect, foreign or domestic, private or public, investments are key elements in the race to recover the economic gap existing between Romania and the western European countries. With this in mind, the Romanian authorities introduced in 2014 two sets of rules with the clear goal of increasing investment levels and making the country more attractive for new and existing players in the economy.

Tax exemption for capital gain and dividends

Starting January 1 2014, revenues from the sale of shares and from dividends received by Romanian companies are not taxable providing two conditions are met: the beneficiary of revenues is holding at least 10% of the shares in the company from which the revenues are derived; and the participation is held for an uninterrupted period of at least one year. Moreover, the facility is also available for revenues obtained from Romania by foreign companies registered in countries that have concluded double taxation treaties with Romania. In this context, it is worth mentioning that the new regulations offer interesting tax planning opportunities, considering that Romania has an extended network of double taxation treaties concluded with 84 countries around the world and that some of these treaties provides for advantageous tax treatments for investors.

There is one more element required to make this incentive fully operational in the Romanian economy: the tax ruling mechanism and procedures must be improved by the tax authorities, because for the time being there are still deficiencies in the system. As long as this is solved, the holding regulations (as they are known by the business environment) shall start showing their benefits towards investors.

Tax exemption for reinvested profits

For companies operating in Romania, a new facility has been available starting July 1 2014: the profits which are reinvested in new non-current assets falling under the category of industrial equipment are exempt from corporate income tax. The equipment acquired using this incentive has to be kept and used by the company for a period representing half of the useful life of each asset (but not more than five years).

From an accounting perspective, the reinvested profit has to be "frozen" in a reserve account and cannot be distributed as dividends. When the management of the company decides to distribute this profit the corporate income tax is due to the tax authorities. However, no interest or penalties for late payment are due.

It is worth mentioning that the tax exemption for reinvested profits is applicable only for the profits obtained by Romanian companies by December 31 2016. Hence, those interested in making use of this facility must consider this constraint.

Gabriel Sincu (gabriel.sincu@ro.ey.com)

EY Romania

Tel: +40 21 402 4000

Website: www.ey.com/ro

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Kingsley Napley’s claimants are arguing that taxing the provision of education breaches the European Convention on Human Rights
While pillar two can progress without the US, it won’t reach the same heights without American involvement, argues Renáta Bláhová, founding partner of BMB Partners Taxand
There are unanswered questions as to how foreign investors could reclaim money via tax credits, advisers suggested
Amid an ever-changing tax environment, India’s advisory market is bustling with competition ahead of the 2025 World Tax rankings and ITR Awards
The deal comes after PwC had accused Paul McNab of using confidential information; in other news, McDermott hired a new London tax head from a US rival
Looking at transfer pricing simplification is “obviously helpful”, but it should be done in line with current standards, a senior government figure reportedly said
The UK Government’s plans to close the tax gap via increased HM Revenue and Customs investment have failed to impress local tax advisers
Under the merged scheme for R&D tax relief introduced last year, rules on contracted out R&D have changed. James Dudbridge argues for a proactive approach when reviewing companies’ commercial arrangements
Cultural nuances could account for tax advisers’ perceived poor cost management, a local partner told ITR
Updated rules represent a significant shift in the Luxembourg TP landscape and emphasise the need for robust arm’s-length calculations, says Vanessa Ramos Ferrin of TransFair Pricing Solutions
Gift this article