Australia: Thin capitalisation and other international tax changes

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Australia: Thin capitalisation and other international tax changes

seymour.jpg

Tom Seymour

As previously reported, the government has announced its position in relation to a range of international tax measures that had been announced by the previous government but not yet legislated. This includes the proposal to tighten the thin capitalisation regime with effect from income years commencing on or after July 1 2014, and includes changes to:

  • Reduce the safe harbour debt limit for general entities from 3:1 to 1.5:1 on a debt to equity basis;

  • Reduce the safe harbour debt limit for non-bank financial entities from 20:1 to 15:1 on a debt to equity basis;

  • Increase the safe harbour minimum capital for banks from 4% to 6% of the risk weighted assets of their Australian operations;

  • Reduce the worldwide gearing ratio from 120% to 100% and making it available to inbound investors; and

  • Increase the de minimis threshold from $250,000 to $2 million of debt deductions.

The alternative arm's-length debt test will remain available, subject to review.

It is unlikely that there will be any transitional provisions or grandfathering for existing funding arrangements.

Taxpayers should note that capitalising debt arrangements to fall within the safe harbour debt limit may have other tax implications. For example, foreign exchange realisation, changes in the rate of tax loss utilisation for tax consolidated groups and commercial debt forgiveness.

In addition to tightening the thin capitalisation regime, the government has made the following announcements:

  • The government will not abolish the provision that enables Australian companies to claim a deduction for interest incurred in earning exempt non-portfolio dividends. Instead, it will introduce a new targeted anti-avoidance provision.

  • Changes will be made to the non-portfolio dividend exemption so that it only applies to instruments that are equity in substance.

  • The non-resident capital gains tax (CGT) provisions will be amended which may result in certain shares held by non-residents now falling within the Australian tax net (applicable to CGT events occurring after May 14 2013).

  • A non-final non-resident withholding tax regime will be introduced (from July 1 2016) under which purchasers will be required to withhold and remit to the Australian Taxation Office 10% of the purchase price of certain taxable Australian property acquired from non-resident vendors.

  • Disappointingly, the government will not proceed with the modernisation of the controlled foreign company provisions.

Tom Seymour (tom.seymour@au.pwc.com)

PwC Australia

Tel: +61 (7) 3257 8623

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The UK regulator is investigating EY’s auditing of the national postal service as it relates to the high-profile Horizon scandal, which saw hundreds wrongfully convicted
The directive will extend cooperation and information exchange around pillar two, according to the Council of the EU
Audit engagement partner Christopher Voogd has also been hit with a £32,500 charge over the firm’s work with Stirling Water Seafield Finance
China’s largest overhaul of its tax administration system in 24 years, featuring enhanced enforcement powers, is underway, says Abe Zhao of FenXun Partners
However, the US president increased tariffs on imported Chinese goods to 125%; in other news, UK tax firm MHA expects to raise £102m from its London listing
A mere three firms accounted for more than 90% of top-up taxes paid, according to research from Deloitte
Taxpayers with Brazilian operations should revisit their withholding positions in light of updated US guidance, writes Rafael Benevides, senior tax counsel at Meta
The MEGlobal Canada decision highlights taxpayers’ frustrations over split jurisdiction for TP assessments as well as a need for legislative reform, one expert tells ITR
New US trade and tax policies risk placing European businesses at a significant structural disadvantage, the group said
The new tariffs could force companies to reroute logistics, renegotiate crucial deals or even uproot their production facilities, one tax expert tells ITR
Gift this article