Mexico: Mexican tax reform: Upcoming changes impacting multinational companies

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Mexico: Mexican tax reform: Upcoming changes impacting multinational companies

cuellar.jpg

sosa.jpg

David Cuellar


Araceli Sosa

On September 8 2013, the executive branch of the Mexican government submitted the 2014 Tax Reform Package to the Mexican Congress, which aims to increase the country's tax revenue. The main proposals would eliminate flat tax and the group taxation regime (tax consolidation), restrict deductions in general, repeal the tax benefits applicable to real estate investment entities (SIBRAS), as well as eliminate other benefits such as accelerated depreciation of assets and certain preoperating expenses, and limit tax-exempt salaries deductions, among others.

In this regard, some of the main upcoming changes (if this package is approved) impacting multinationals are as follows:

  • The tax consolidation regime would be repealed by 2014 and the deferred income tax generated in previous years would be triggered according to a detailed procedure incorporated in the new tax law (five-year schedule for payment).

  • A brand new consolidation regime would be introduced, which offers a three-year income tax deferral period.

  • A new 10% corporate tax rate (CTR) to dividends paid by Mexican entities to foreign residents. Thus, dividends would be subject to the 30% CTR already applied, plus a 10% rate. At the time, there is no certainty about whether this additional tax would be creditable in foreign countries.

  • Payments abroad made to related parties would be non-deductible if such payments are subject to a preferred tax regime, which means that the recipient's income is taxed at an effective tax rate that is less than 75% of the Mexican CTR, or those payments are part of a double dipping structure in place. According to the current language of this provision, it seems to be applicable to all sorts of payments (deductions).

  • At the moment, to claim the benefits of a tax treaty, entities have to prove the tax residence of the foreign residents. The new Bill includes that it would also be necessary to demonstrate under oath that revenues are subject to double taxation.

  • Additional restrictions are proposed to exemptions granted to foreign pension funds investing in Mexico.

  • Several limitations to the maquila regime: the permanent establishment (PE) protection would only apply to operations with qualified entities exporting 90% of its total revenues, the protection of PE for maquila shelter would only apply for a three year period; and

  • Temporary imports under IMMEX (maquiladora programme) would be taxed at 16% VAT rate.

According to the Mexican legislative process, the proposed provisions will be discussed by the Mexican Congress, and the reform is expected to be approved by October 31 2013; however, the reform must be published in the Official Gazette before the end of this year to come into effect on January 1 2014.

David Cuellar (david.cuellar@mx.pwc.com) and Araceli Sosa (araceli.sosa@mx.pwc.com), Mexico City

PwC

Tel: +52 55 5263 5816

Fax: +52 55 5263 6010

Website: www.pwc.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Kingsley Napley’s claimants are arguing that taxing the provision of education breaches the European Convention on Human Rights
While pillar two can progress without the US, it won’t reach the same heights without American involvement, argues Renáta Bláhová, founding partner of BMB Partners Taxand
There are unanswered questions as to how foreign investors could reclaim money via tax credits, advisers suggested
Amid an ever-changing tax environment, India’s advisory market is bustling with competition ahead of the 2025 World Tax rankings and ITR Awards
The deal comes after PwC had accused Paul McNab of using confidential information; in other news, McDermott hired a new London tax head from a US rival
Looking at transfer pricing simplification is “obviously helpful”, but it should be done in line with current standards, a senior government figure reportedly said
The UK Government’s plans to close the tax gap via increased HM Revenue and Customs investment have failed to impress local tax advisers
Under the merged scheme for R&D tax relief introduced last year, rules on contracted out R&D have changed. James Dudbridge argues for a proactive approach when reviewing companies’ commercial arrangements
Cultural nuances could account for tax advisers’ perceived poor cost management, a local partner told ITR
Updated rules represent a significant shift in the Luxembourg TP landscape and emphasise the need for robust arm’s-length calculations, says Vanessa Ramos Ferrin of TransFair Pricing Solutions
Gift this article