Switzerland: Will automatic exchange of information arrive in Switzerland?

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Switzerland: Will automatic exchange of information arrive in Switzerland?

weber.jpg

mies.jpg

Markus Weber


Hans Mies

It was only a little over a month ago when the G20 communicated during the St. Petersburg summit that it fully endorses the OECD efforts to establish a new single global standard for the automatic exchange of information. The new standard should allow for multilateral and bilateral exchange of information for tax purposes. Given the objective of the standard to represent a powerful tool against tax evasion, key for its success is that it is implemented and accepted on a global scale. A pro-active role in accepting, adopting and shaping the mechanism could be in the interest of Switzerland. While in the public (and political) debate in Switzerland concerns are expressed on the implementation of a multilateral automatic exchange of information the question arises as to what extent these concerns are justified and whether a new legal reality has not already to a certain extent forced an automatic exchange of information upon Switzerland.

Switzerland always took a rather conservative approach regarding the exchange of information which can be illustrated by the observations it made in the past to Article 26 of the OECD Model Treaty, whereby the scope of the article was limited to the exchange of information that was necessary for carrying out the provisions of the tax treaty. Over the years, developments in international tax (treaty) law have caused Switzerland to adapt its approach.

In 2009, the Swiss Federal Council announced that in its new tax treaty policy it would apply the standards as laid down in Article 26 without any reservations.

With the closing of the intergovernmental agreement between Switzerland and the US on the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA), the US demonstrates the ability to implement an exchange of information methodology by forcing other jurisdictions to participate in their change in domestic legislation. FATCA's success is now observed by many states with a great deal of interest and is already referred to as the possible new standard in respect to exchange of information.

The question must be and will be openly discussed whether it would be advisable for Switzerland to follow the conclusions of the Summer 2013 Expert Group Report which suggests to work closely together with the OECD on a mutual approach for the adoption of a global standard and in this way to be able to present sustainable alternatives to new isolated initiatives by powerful states on information exchange.

Very soon, the Swiss voters might decide which road the country will take as a political committee announced recently that it will start collecting votes for a referendum against FATCA. It shows that automatic exchange of information is still controversial within Switzerland.

Markus Weber (markweber@deloitte.ch)

Tel: +41 58 279 7527

Hans Mies (hmies@deloitte.ch)

Tel: +41 58 279 7470

Deloitte

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Kingsley Napley’s claimants are arguing that taxing the provision of education breaches the European Convention on Human Rights
While pillar two can progress without the US, it won’t reach the same heights without American involvement, argues Renáta Bláhová, founding partner of BMB Partners Taxand
There are unanswered questions as to how foreign investors could reclaim money via tax credits, advisers suggested
Amid an ever-changing tax environment, India’s advisory market is bustling with competition ahead of the 2025 World Tax rankings and ITR Awards
The deal comes after PwC had accused Paul McNab of using confidential information; in other news, McDermott hired a new London tax head from a US rival
Looking at transfer pricing simplification is “obviously helpful”, but it should be done in line with current standards, a senior government figure reportedly said
The UK Government’s plans to close the tax gap via increased HM Revenue and Customs investment have failed to impress local tax advisers
Under the merged scheme for R&D tax relief introduced last year, rules on contracted out R&D have changed. James Dudbridge argues for a proactive approach when reviewing companies’ commercial arrangements
Cultural nuances could account for tax advisers’ perceived poor cost management, a local partner told ITR
Updated rules represent a significant shift in the Luxembourg TP landscape and emphasise the need for robust arm’s-length calculations, says Vanessa Ramos Ferrin of TransFair Pricing Solutions
Gift this article