South Africa: The gateway into Africa

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

South Africa: The gateway into Africa

dachs.jpg

Peter Dachs

Recent amendments to South African exchange control rules aim to facilitate domestic investment in Africa and other offshore operations by relaxing exchange controls in relation to headquarter companies and holding companies in specific circumstances.

Headquarter companies

Companies are entitled to certain tax benefits if they qualify as headquarter companies in terms of section 9I of the Income Tax Act.

Furthermore, should a company qualify as a headquarter company for exchange control purposes, such company will be treated as an exchange control non-resident.

Both from a tax and an exchange control perspective each shareholder must hold at least 10% of the shares in the headquarter company. From an exchange control perspective at the end of each financial year at least 80% of the assets of the company will be required to consist of foreign assets excluding cash or debts with a term of less than one year.

From a tax perspective at the end of a year of assessment at least 80% of the cost of the assets excluding cash of the company will be required to consist of equity shares in, debt owed by or intellectual property licenced by the headquarter company to another foreign company.

Should a company meet the exchange control requirements of a headquarter company, transactions by South African exchange control resident entities with headquarter companies will be viewed as transactions with non-residents. In addition, headquarter companies may freely borrow from abroad and such funds may be deployed locally or offshore.

Holding companies

A new holding company regime applicable to entities listed on the JSE has recently been introduced. In terms of this regime, a listed entity may establish one subsidiary, to be registered with the Financial Surveillance Department. This company will be entitled to:

  • Upon receiving authorisation from an authorised dealer, receive transfers from its parent entity of up to ZAR750 million ($76 million) per year (although transfers in excess of ZAR750 million will also be considered upon application to the Financial Surveillance Department);

  • Raise and deploy capital offshore without restriction, provided such capital is without recourse to South Africa, that is not the subject of any South African guarantees;

  • Act as cash management centre for South African entities;

  • Engage in cash pooling without restriction;

  • Choose their functional currency;

  • Make use of foreign currency and rand denominated accounts; and

  • Freely transfer any income generated from cash management.

To achieve this status, the parent entity will be required to incorporate an entity which will operate as a South African tax resident and be incorporated and effectively managed in South Africa.

National Treasury has indicated that this regime may in future be extended to other entities.

Peter Dachs (pdachs@ens.co.za)

ENSafrica – Taxand

Tel: +27 21 410 2500

Website: www.ens.co.za

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Kingsley Napley’s claimants are arguing that taxing the provision of education breaches the European Convention on Human Rights
While pillar two can progress without the US, it won’t reach the same heights without American involvement, argues Renáta Bláhová, founding partner of BMB Partners Taxand
There are unanswered questions as to how foreign investors could reclaim money via tax credits, advisers suggested
Amid an ever-changing tax environment, India’s advisory market is bustling with competition ahead of the 2025 World Tax rankings and ITR Awards
The deal comes after PwC had accused Paul McNab of using confidential information; in other news, McDermott hired a new London tax head from a US rival
Looking at transfer pricing simplification is “obviously helpful”, but it should be done in line with current standards, a senior government figure reportedly said
The UK Government’s plans to close the tax gap via increased HM Revenue and Customs investment have failed to impress local tax advisers
Under the merged scheme for R&D tax relief introduced last year, rules on contracted out R&D have changed. James Dudbridge argues for a proactive approach when reviewing companies’ commercial arrangements
Cultural nuances could account for tax advisers’ perceived poor cost management, a local partner told ITR
Updated rules represent a significant shift in the Luxembourg TP landscape and emphasise the need for robust arm’s-length calculations, says Vanessa Ramos Ferrin of TransFair Pricing Solutions
Gift this article