US Outbound: Fiscal Cliff Bill extends key international tax provisions

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

US Outbound: Fiscal Cliff Bill extends key international tax provisions

foley.jpg

mcgrew.jpg

Sean Foley


Landon McGrew

On January 2 2013, President Obama signed into law the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012, averting tax elements of the fiscal cliff. In addition to permanently extending the Bush-era tax cuts for individuals with income of less than $400,000 and joint filers with income of less than $450,000, the legislation also temporarily extended two key international tax provisions. These international tax extenders provide important exceptions to the current taxation of a foreign subsidiary's earnings under the subpart F rules.

Subpart F income

In general, US multinationals are not subjected to US tax on the earnings of their foreign subsidiaries until those earnings are repatriated to the US. However, there are certain types of income, such as interest, dividends, rents, and royalties, that are subject to current taxation in the US when earned by a foreign subsidiary under the subpart F rules found in sections 951 through 964 of the Internal Revenue Code. There are a number of exceptions to current taxation under the subpart F rules, including the controlled foreign company (CFC) look-through rule of section 954(c)(6) and the active financing exception of section 954(h). These two exceptions had expired at the end of 2011.

The fiscal cliff extenders

The American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 retroactively to January 1 2012 extended the CFC look-through rule of section 954(c)(6) and the active financing exception of section 954(h) to December 31 2013 for calendar year taxpayers. Without these extensions, US multinationals would have been subject to US tax on these types of subpart F income during the 2012 taxable year. A brief description of these two international tax extenders is included below.

Under the CFC look-through rule of section 954(c)(6), dividends, interest, rents, and royalties received by a CFC from another CFC that is a related person (as defined in section 954(d)(3)) are generally excluded from the definition of subpart F income to the extent allocable to income of the related CFC that is not subpart F income. The Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT) has estimated that the two-year extension of the CFC look-through rule will cost approximately $1.5 billion over 10 years.

Under the active financing exception of section 954(h), income earned by a foreign subsidiary that is derived from the active conduct of a banking, financing, or similar business is generally excluded from the definition of subpart F income. The JCT has estimated that the extension of the active financing exception will cost approximately $11.2 billion over 10 years.

In light of the extension of these rules, US multinationals should consider revisiting situations where planning may have been deferred or postponed because of the uncertainty of whether these provisions would be further extended. Moreover, given the retroactivity of the legislation, and the fact that the legislation was enacted in January 2013 (and not by the end of 2012), multinationals should also consider its impact on financial accounting.

The information contained herein is of a general nature and based on authorities that are subject to change. Applicability of the information to specific situations should be determined through consultation with your tax adviser.

This article represents the views of the authors only, and does not necessarily represent the views or professional advice of KPMG LLP.

Sean Foley (sffoley@kpmg.com) and Landon McGrew (lmcgrew@kpmg.com), Washington DC

KPMG

Tel: +1 202 533 5588

Fax: +1 202 315 3087

Website: www.us.kpmg.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

India also brokered its first-ever multilateral APA last year, the Central Board of Taxes announced
A global tax framework may not materialise anytime soon, but a common set of principles is becoming increasingly necessary, Rudolf Winkenius also tells ITR
Kingsley Napley’s claimants are arguing that taxing the provision of education breaches the European Convention on Human Rights
While pillar two can progress without the US, it won’t reach the same heights without American involvement, argues Renáta Bláhová, founding partner of BMB Partners Taxand
There are unanswered questions as to how foreign investors could reclaim money via tax credits, advisers suggested
Amid an ever-changing tax environment, India’s advisory market is bustling with competition ahead of the 2025 World Tax rankings and ITR Awards
The deal comes after PwC had accused Paul McNab of using confidential information; in other news, McDermott hired a new London tax head from a US rival
Looking at transfer pricing simplification is “obviously helpful”, but it should be done in line with current standards, a senior government figure reportedly said
The UK Government’s plans to close the tax gap via increased HM Revenue and Customs investment have failed to impress local tax advisers
Under the merged scheme for R&D tax relief introduced last year, rules on contracted out R&D have changed. James Dudbridge argues for a proactive approach when reviewing companies’ commercial arrangements
Gift this article