FYR Macedonia: Bad debt and forceful collection deadlines

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

FYR Macedonia: Bad debt and forceful collection deadlines

kostovska.jpg

Elena Kostovska

Because of the private sector's low liquidity as a result of the global financial downturn, companies frequently find themselves reaching for the last available tool to collect uncollected receivables, the forceful collection mechanism. It is worth noting that the procedure to forcefully collect outstanding debt is regulated by certain deadlines after which the said debt becomes obsolete; therefore is considered a bad debt. The following information is of interest to creditors in the private sectors as well as tax debtors that have outstanding liabilities towards the Public Revenue Office in FYR Macedonia.

Should the legal deadline for commencing a procedure for forceful claim collection have passed, the debtor has the right to file a court appeal and stop the procedure.

A legal period of one year within which a forceful collection procedure can be started is provided for the provision of communication services (including radio, TV, postal services, telecommunications).

Municipal taxes (including property taxes, annual company municipal taxes and personal income taxes) become obsolete within two years of the prescribed payment date as do any administrative fees.

Within a period of three years after the date of the claim creation, the following types of receivables become legally obsolete: Claims between parties that have a mutual written agreement for the provision of goods/services, property lease as well as net salaries.

A legal timeframe of five years (as of the date the liability has arisen) is provided as a regular or forceful collection period for, among others, the following debt categories: Long and short term credit claims, claims for the provision of products/services between legal entities and physical persons; legal advice service provision claims, construction services' provision claims and customs claims.

It is also worth noting that all outstanding tax payments (corporate or personal, including social contributions) and additional tax related claims that the Tax Authorities have from the private sector become obsolete 10 years after the tax liability has arisen. According to the Law for Tax Procedures, after this time has passed, the tax debt is written off.

Elena Kostovska (elena.kostovska@eurofast.eu)

Eurofast Global, Skopje Office, FYR Macedonia

Tel: +389 2 2400225

Website: www.eurofast.eu

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

India also brokered its first-ever multilateral APA last year, the Central Board of Taxes announced
A global tax framework may not materialise anytime soon, but a common set of principles is becoming increasingly necessary, Rudolf Winkenius also tells ITR
Kingsley Napley’s claimants are arguing that taxing the provision of education breaches the European Convention on Human Rights
While pillar two can progress without the US, it won’t reach the same heights without American involvement, argues Renáta Bláhová, founding partner of BMB Partners Taxand
There are unanswered questions as to how foreign investors could reclaim money via tax credits, advisers suggested
Amid an ever-changing tax environment, India’s advisory market is bustling with competition ahead of the 2025 World Tax rankings and ITR Awards
The deal comes after PwC had accused Paul McNab of using confidential information; in other news, McDermott hired a new London tax head from a US rival
Looking at transfer pricing simplification is “obviously helpful”, but it should be done in line with current standards, a senior government figure reportedly said
The UK Government’s plans to close the tax gap via increased HM Revenue and Customs investment have failed to impress local tax advisers
Under the merged scheme for R&D tax relief introduced last year, rules on contracted out R&D have changed. James Dudbridge argues for a proactive approach when reviewing companies’ commercial arrangements
Gift this article