Pierre Collin and Nicolas Colin

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Pierre Collin and Nicolas Colin

Researchers, France

Pierre Collin and Nicolas Colin

International Tax Review: Why in particular were you and Pierre commissioned to research this report?

Nicolas Colin: Pierre Collin is a member of the Conseil d'Etat, the highest French court, with the power to decide a case involving our government. He is specialised in corporate taxation and is recognised as one of our best practitioners in that field. I was hired to co-write the report with him both as a senior civil servant working in the Ministry of Finance, and as an expert in many things related to the digital economy - I've worked in that industry for two years as an entrepreneur and I co-wrote a book (with Henri Verdier, another entrepreneur) dedicated to educating the French elite on the digital economy, L'Âge de la multitude, Entreprendre et gouverner après la révolution numérique.

ITR: What interaction have you had with decision makers (OECD/ national officials) since the report was published?

NC: Our report launched yet another wave of legislative and administrative works around digital economy and taxation. The Conseil national du numérique (an government advisory body) was charged with conducting a consultation of all interested parties, notably around the proposals put forward in our report. Philippe Marini (a senator and chairman of the Senate Finance Committee) proposed a Bill to establish a new version of his Google tax. As with the OECD, the interactions were informal but frequent and in-depth, especially on the road to adopting the BEPS action plan.

ITR: How long did it take to complete the report and what was the research process?

NC: The report was completed in almost six months, from August 2012 to January 2013. We heard many interested parties, notably experts in corporate taxation, and experts in the digital economy, including in the Silicon Valley and in several American universities. A large volume of documentation was gathered, especially articles in the press that proved useful sources to describe and analyse digital companies' business models. All sources were mentioned in almost 500 footnotes and a bibliography, all included in the report. A small group of people, mainly entrepreneurs in the digital economy, were especially helpful with identifying relevant experts, contacting prominent scholars or entrepreneurs, and advising on the general architecture of the report. Since the publication, Pierre and I have been invited in many circles to present the report and discuss the latest evolutions.

ITR: What kind of reaction have you had from the business community?

NC: The report was a unique opportunity to explain what the digital economy is and how it creates value. Some politicians and senior civil servants had their first opportunity to get an insight of the digital economy. In front of the business community, the report helped make the point that the digital economy is not limited to certain industries such as advertising or retail, but instead disrupts our whole economy, industry after industry. Business leaders belonging to the digital economy generally praised the report as an accurate description of how they create value, even though they rejected the idea of creating any special regime to tax their companies, as expected.

The Global Tax 50 2013

« Previous

Paul Collier

View the complete list

Next »

Tim Cook and Eric Schmidt

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Amid an ever-changing tax environment, India’s advisory market is bustling with competition ahead of the 2025 World Tax rankings and ITR Awards
The deal comes after PwC had accused Paul McNab of using confidential information; in other news, McDermott hired a new London tax head from a US rival
Looking at transfer pricing simplification is “obviously helpful”, but it should be done in line with current standards, a senior government figure reportedly said
The UK Government’s plans to close the tax gap via increased HM Revenue and Customs investment have failed to impress local tax advisers
Under the merged scheme for R&D tax relief introduced last year, rules on contracted out R&D have changed. James Dudbridge argues for a proactive approach when reviewing companies’ commercial arrangements
Cultural nuances could account for tax advisers’ perceived poor cost management, a local partner told ITR
Updated rules represent a significant shift in the Luxembourg TP landscape and emphasise the need for robust arm’s-length calculations, says Vanessa Ramos Ferrin of TransFair Pricing Solutions
KPMG Law US revolves around contract managed services and the US is the largest market for that, Stuart Bedford tells ITR in an exclusive interview
The US law firm’s tax counsel tells ITR about inspirations from a ‘legendary’ German tax scholar, perfecting riesling wine and what makes tax cool
Wopke Hoekstra also swore the EU would ‘hit back harder’ if faced with a trade war; in other news, a UK watchdog has launched an investigation into an audit completed by MHA
Gift this article