Canada: Proposed legislative amendments to foreign affiliate dumping rules

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Canada: Proposed legislative amendments to foreign affiliate dumping rules

wong-sabrina.jpg

dezfuli-atbin.jpg

Sabrina Wong and Atbin Dezfuli, Blake Cassels & Graydon

On August 16 2013, the government of Canada introduced draft legislative proposals (August 16 proposals) to amend its foreign affiliate (FA) dumping rules. The measures may be introduced into Parliament as early as autumn 2013.

The FA dumping rules generally apply where a corporation resident in Canada (CRIC) controlled by a non-resident corporation (parent) makes an investment in a corporation that is or becomes an FA of the CRIC. Where CRIC gives non-share consideration for acquiring the investment, a deemed dividend to its parent can be triggered that will be subject to Canadian withholding tax, except to the extent it reduces the CRIC's paid-up capital (PUC offset rule). Where the CRIC gives its shares as consideration, the PUC of such shares are deemed to be nil.

The August 16 proposals contain changes to the FA dumping rules generally of a relieving nature, including:

  • Limiting the application of the FA dumping rules where a CRIC makes an investment in an FA before CRIC becomes controlled by the parent;

  • Making the application of the PUC offset rule completely automatic and significantly amending the scope of the dividend substitution election (the QSC election) that allows other Canadian members of the corporate group to be treated as having paid the dividend;

  • Extending the application of the rule that reinstates previously reduced PUC in certain circumstances (the PUC reinstatement rule), including expanding the types of FA investments to which the rule could apply; and

  • Broadening the rules which except certain amalgamations of taxable Canadian corporations from the FA dumping rules.

However, the August 16 proposals also include amendments aimed at preventing taxpayers from using certain relieving provisions to avoid the application of the FA dumping rules.

The impact of the rules and the proposed changes should be carefully considered by any foreign investor planning an acquisition of, or investment in, any Canadian company with foreign operations.

Sabrina Wong (sabrina.wong@blakes.com) and Atbin Dezfuli (atbin.dezfuli@blakes.com)

Blake, Cassels & Graydon

Tel: +1 416 863 2400 and Fax: +1 416 863 2653

Website:www.blakes.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

India also brokered its first-ever multilateral APA last year, the Central Board of Taxes announced
A global tax framework may not materialise anytime soon, but a common set of principles is becoming increasingly necessary, Rudolf Winkenius also tells ITR
Kingsley Napley’s claimants are arguing that taxing the provision of education breaches the European Convention on Human Rights
While pillar two can progress without the US, it won’t reach the same heights without American involvement, argues Renáta Bláhová, founding partner of BMB Partners Taxand
There are unanswered questions as to how foreign investors could reclaim money via tax credits, advisers suggested
Amid an ever-changing tax environment, India’s advisory market is bustling with competition ahead of the 2025 World Tax rankings and ITR Awards
The deal comes after PwC had accused Paul McNab of using confidential information; in other news, McDermott hired a new London tax head from a US rival
Looking at transfer pricing simplification is “obviously helpful”, but it should be done in line with current standards, a senior government figure reportedly said
The UK Government’s plans to close the tax gap via increased HM Revenue and Customs investment have failed to impress local tax advisers
Under the merged scheme for R&D tax relief introduced last year, rules on contracted out R&D have changed. James Dudbridge argues for a proactive approach when reviewing companies’ commercial arrangements
Gift this article