Chile aligns with OECD three-tiered transfer pricing documentation approach

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Chile aligns with OECD three-tiered transfer pricing documentation approach

Sponsored by

sponsored-firms-pwc.png
Switzerland will introduce income inclusion rules

Roberto Carlos Rivas and Carolina Céspedes Lacombe of PwC take a look at the practical implications of the latest transfer pricing affidavits in Chile.

As expected on August 31 2020, the Chilean Internal Revenue Service (IRS) included two new affidavits (the annual master file affidavit and the annual local file affidavit) regarding transfer pricing in Chile.

With these new information requirements, the IRS is aligned with the three-tiered transfer pricing documentation approach, contained in Action 13 of the OECD’s BEPS project: the country-by-country report (in force in Chile since 2016), the master file, and the local file. Accordingly, taxpayers domiciled or resident in Chile that carry out transactions with related parties abroad must deliver information and documentation to the tax authority in accordance with international standards.

Although these new documentation requirements would update Chile with the global trend of transparency in the way of doing business within a multinational enterprise (MNE) group – both for multinationals that have a presence in Chile, and for national economic groups that have subsidiaries abroad — the new requirements reflects a greater concern regarding the way of doing business in companies belonging to a business group. It suggests greater scrutiny by the IRS to the administrations of companies in Chile, which must prove that their transactions with related parties abroad are consistent with the arm's-length principle.

To comply with these new obligations, taxpayers must provide the IRS a wide range of background information. On the one hand, the master file affidavit mainly refers to the MNE group, requesting the organisational structure, the names of all MNE group entities, countries, advance pricing agreements (APAs) in force, business reorganisations, transfer of intangibles and transfer pricing policies, among others. On the other hand, the local file affidavit mainly refers to Chilean taxpayers and requests general background of the entity in Chile, such as number of workers, organisational divisions, business reorganisations during the reported year, details of the transactions carried out with related parties abroad, information regarding the transfer pricing analysis of each transaction (interquartile range, number of comparables, use of comparability adjustments) and economic-financial information, which includes income and operating costs, administrative and sales expenses, and operating results, among other concepts.

In addition, Chilean taxpayers must provide the IRS – through an electronic file – descriptive and specific documentation to support the information filled in the affidavits. This includes matters such as functional analysis, financial activities, analysis of the transactions with related parties, including details of the comparability analysis carried out, segmented financial information, if applicable, agreements between MNE group entities, consolidated and individual financial statements, transfer pricing policies, etc. 

Bearing in mind that Chile is a member of the OECD, multinationals that have a subsidiary in Chile and national economic groups that have subsidiaries abroad should be prepared to face a greater scrutiny of the Chilean Tax Authority regarding compliance with the arm's-length principle and the terms under which their inter-company transactions are carried out. It is important to highlight that the master file and local file affidavits, as well as the annexes and documents required in each of them, must be submitted as of tax year 2021, with the information corresponding to the commercial year 2020, on the last business day of June of each year, consistent with the transfer pricing and country-by-country affidavits, a term that could be extended once for a period of three months.

Now that the Chilean IRS has aligned with the OECD three-tiered transfer pricing approach, Chilean entities belonging to a MNE group must be prepared, not only for timely compliance with these new formal obligations, but also for a greater concern regarding the way of doing business in companies belonging to a business group.

Roberto Carlos RivasT: +56 2 940 0000E: roberto.carlos.rivas@pwc.com

Carolina Céspedes LacombeT: +55 22 9400741E: carolina.cespedes@pwc.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The ruling is ‘well-structured’ in its references to the OECD TP guidelines, one expert says, while another argues it overlooks key technical issues
India also brokered its first-ever multilateral APA last year, the Central Board of Taxes announced
A global tax framework may not materialise anytime soon, but a common set of principles is becoming increasingly necessary, Rudolf Winkenius also tells ITR
Kingsley Napley’s claimants are arguing that taxing the provision of education breaches the European Convention on Human Rights
While pillar two can progress without the US, it won’t reach the same heights without American involvement, argues Renáta Bláhová, founding partner of BMB Partners Taxand
There are unanswered questions as to how foreign investors could reclaim money via tax credits, advisers suggested
Amid an ever-changing tax environment, India’s advisory market is bustling with competition ahead of the 2025 World Tax rankings and ITR Awards
The deal comes after PwC had accused Paul McNab of using confidential information; in other news, McDermott hired a new London tax head from a US rival
Looking at transfer pricing simplification is “obviously helpful”, but it should be done in line with current standards, a senior government figure reportedly said
The UK Government’s plans to close the tax gap via increased HM Revenue and Customs investment have failed to impress local tax advisers
Gift this article