Tax uncertainty emphasises the need for reform at ITR’s Brazil Tax Forum 2020

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Tax uncertainty emphasises the need for reform at ITR’s Brazil Tax Forum 2020

Brazil cannot continue without a tax reform

Taxpayers at ITR’s inaugural Brazil Tax Forum said that continued uncertainty across all tax areas only further emphasises the need for tax reform, but politics stand in the way.

ITR held its first Brazil Tax Forum on September 9-10 to give Brazilian businesses and tax advisors a platform to discuss the many obstacles they face, eventually leading the conversation to the need for a comprehensive tax reform.

In-house business leaders noted that tax uncertainty arising from having a complex system is being felt across indirect taxation, direct taxation, and transfer pricing (TP) and makes their jobs more difficult. This is why Brazil – even as one of the world’s largest economies – comfortably holds first place in many tax complexity rankings.

With regards to the country’s intricate indirect tax system, where the federal government, states and municipalities are scrapping for tax revenue, a lack of clear definitions in indirect tax judgments decided in favour of taxpayers continue to make it difficult for Brazilian taxpayers to gain the level of tax certainty they seek.

“In 2017, we had a favourable decision regarding [a] matter but this doesn’t mean that the judicial discussions are over. After three years we have no definitions or security for the taxpayer over how, when, and which credits we can offset to effectively compensate other federal taxes,” said Ana Paula Olinto Yurgel, tax manager at Yara Brasil Fertilizantes, commenting on the ICMS exclusion for the PIS/COFINS taxable basis.

Furthermore, taxpayers have say the Brazilian Supreme Court has contradicted and confused the rules on tax incentives granted by states, delaying the end of the country’s tax wars.

“We could see the light at the end of the tunnel when we consider the situation of the tax war in 2017… In August we were surprised by two decisions by the Supreme Court,” said Paulo Nobrega, head of tax at Ontex.

Panellists were also unimpressed by Brazil’s proposed digital services tax (DST), citing more prominent concerns including how to classify digital offerings and pay for foreign technology. Infighting between the state and municipal authorities, combined with a lack of clarity in some legislation, is also causing problems.

“DST proposals don’t seem to fit the Brazilian system… it’s not a good way to address the problems we have here,” said Rodolfo Araújo, head of tax at iFood.

Close to 80% of tax professionals said the country’s tax system has prevented corporate investment on at least one occasion. Some investment opportunities may come from more merger and acquisition (M&A) activity expected in 2021 as many businesses are priced down due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Investment and deal-making in Brazil has historically presented more tax risks for multinational companies than in other countries, largely due to the complex tax framework and issues with the judiciary.

The country, however, is moving towards OECD standards on transfer pricing (TP) and is encouraging a broader shift in how the tax authorities are dealing with taxpayers to develop a cooperative culture.

Tax uncertainty reigns on all fronts, only reinforcing the need for an overhaul of the tax system. There are concerns that the Brazilian government could trigger a wave of litigation in the short-term through its smaller tax reform. Nevertheless, many businesses see this as a necessary evil to achieve fundamental change.

Reform is key.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

World Tax global head of research Jon Moore tells ITR how his team spots standout submissions, and gives early statistical insights into this year’s entries
Australia’s conservative opposition will repeal controversial tax agent reporting rules if elected in the country’s May general election
Shapley would be the fourth person to hold the job this year; in other news, UK tax advisory firm MHA raised fewer funds than expected from its London IPO
The US needs to be involved in pillar one for there to be more international acceptance of the project, Michael Masciangelo says
The UK regulator is investigating EY’s auditing of the national postal service as it relates to the high-profile Horizon scandal, which saw hundreds wrongfully convicted
The directive will extend cooperation and information exchange around pillar two, according to the Council of the EU
Audit engagement partner Christopher Voogd has also been hit with a £32,500 charge over the firm’s work with Stirling Water Seafield Finance
China’s largest overhaul of its tax administration system in 24 years, featuring enhanced enforcement powers, is underway, says Abe Zhao of FenXun Partners
However, the US president increased tariffs on imported Chinese goods to 125%; in other news, UK tax firm MHA expects to raise £102m from its London listing
A mere three firms accounted for more than 90% of top-up taxes paid, according to research from Deloitte
Gift this article