Central Revenue rules on the business contribution of a PE in Italy

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Central Revenue rules on the business contribution of a PE in Italy

Sponsored by

sponsored-firms-hager.png
The case has corporate income tax, VAT and registration tax implications

Gian Luca Nieddu and Barbara Scampuddu of Hager & Partners outline the corporate income tax, VAT and registration tax implications of the Central Revenue’s decision.

The contribution of the entire business of an EU company’s Italian permanent establishment (PE) to another EU company’s Italian PE is tax neutral under section 176 of Italian Tax Code (TUIR). This is the conclusion reached by the Central Revenue, as an answer to the request for advance ruling No. 633 as of December 31 2020.

Circumstances of the case

The case concerned an EU company (hereinafter ALFA) which intended to transfer its PE in Italy (hereinafter ALFA Italy PE) to the BETA company resident in another country of the EU, against of the issue of shares by BETA.

In particular, all active and passive assets of ALFA Italy PE were to flow entirely into a new PE, also in Italy, of the conferring subject, BETA.

Subsequently, the transferring company ALFA would carry out the distribution of profits in kind (corresponding to the investment in BETA, received against the aforementioned business contribution) in favour of its parent company GAMMA.

Accordingly, the Italian PE of ALFA would be transferred to BETA, and ALFA group will continue the activity in Italy, as well as in the other member states, where similar operations will be carried out.

Opinion of the Central Revenue

The Central Revenue expressed its opinion on the case considering the tax treatment in terms of corporate income tax (IRES), VAT and registration tax.

IRES

The contribution of the entire business of an EU company’s Italian PE to another EU company’s Italian PE is tax neutral under section 176 of Italian Tax Code (TUIR). However, if the shareholding acquired as a result of the contribution:

  • Is assigned to the ‘contributing’ PE and then transferred to its parent company; or

  • Is assigned directly (upon contribution) to the parent company; or

  • Is not functionally connected with the PE; or

  • the capital gain, if any, realised by the ‘contributing’ PE is taxable, possibly under the PEX regime if the conditions are met (Italian tax authority, answer to request for advance ruling No. 633 as of December 31 2020).

VAT

From the point of view of the applicable VAT regime, the transfer of the business unit consisting of the assets and liabilities constituting the Italian PE of ALFA, in favour of the new PE in Italy of BETA, is excluded from the field of application of VAT, pursuant to Article 2, paragraph 3, letter (b), of the Presidential Decree No. 633 of 1972.

In this regard, Article 19-bis2, paragraph 7, of the Presidential Decree No. 633 of 1972 obliges the taxable person beneficiary of business contribution to rectify the VAT deduction, if the conditions are met.

Registration tax

For the purposes of registration tax, considering that the business contribution is excluded from the field of application of VAT, it must be subject to registration tax according to Article 2, paragraph 1, letter (d), of the Presidential Decree No. 131 of 1986 (TUR), by virtue of the principle of VAT-register, alternatively referred to in Article 40 of the TUR.

In regard to the extent of the registration tax to be applied, it is necessary to refer to Article 4, paragraph 1, letter (b) of the Tariff, Part I, of the TUR, which establishes the application of the registration tax in a fixed amount. 

 

Gian Luca Nieddu

Partner

E: gianluca.nieddu@hager-partners.it

Barbara Scampuddu

Partner

E: barbara.scampuddu@hager-partners.it

 

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Kingsley Napley’s claimants are arguing that taxing the provision of education breaches the European Convention on Human Rights
While pillar two can progress without the US, it won’t reach the same heights without American involvement, argues Renáta Bláhová, founding partner of BMB Partners Taxand
There are unanswered questions as to how foreign investors could reclaim money via tax credits, advisers suggested
Amid an ever-changing tax environment, India’s advisory market is bustling with competition ahead of the 2025 World Tax rankings and ITR Awards
The deal comes after PwC had accused Paul McNab of using confidential information; in other news, McDermott hired a new London tax head from a US rival
Looking at transfer pricing simplification is “obviously helpful”, but it should be done in line with current standards, a senior government figure reportedly said
The UK Government’s plans to close the tax gap via increased HM Revenue and Customs investment have failed to impress local tax advisers
Under the merged scheme for R&D tax relief introduced last year, rules on contracted out R&D have changed. James Dudbridge argues for a proactive approach when reviewing companies’ commercial arrangements
Cultural nuances could account for tax advisers’ perceived poor cost management, a local partner told ITR
Updated rules represent a significant shift in the Luxembourg TP landscape and emphasise the need for robust arm’s-length calculations, says Vanessa Ramos Ferrin of TransFair Pricing Solutions
Gift this article