Switzerland: A tonnage tax for maritime activities

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Switzerland: A tonnage tax for maritime activities

Sponsored by

Sponsored_Firms_deloitte.png
The court had to decide on two separate questions

René Zulauf and Manuel Angehrn of Deloitte Switzerland look at how the federal government has planned to boost the country’s attractiveness as an international business hub for maritime activities.

Switzerland, located geographically in the heart of Europe, is associated with mountain peaks rather than a global maritime reach. However the country has one of the largest maritime merchant fleets in the world (11th in size globally, close behind the UK).

To strengthen the attraction of Switzerland to companies that operate and manage maritime activities, the Swiss federal government recently issued a consultation draft with regard to the introduction of a tonnage tax.

The proposed (simplified) law is that the taxable ‘profit’ of eligible companies would be based on cargo volume (net tonnage) rather than operating profits or volume of cargoes carried. The tax would be optional, and companies could choose instead to be taxed by existing methods.

It is considered that the tax would boost Switzerland’s attractiveness as an international business hub for maritime activities. This would help enlarge the shipping industry’s footprint in Switzerland. Further, the legislative draft provides incentives to modernise fleets and make them more environmentally friendly.

Eligible vessels and entities

  • Both corporations and individuals operating maritime vessels (freight and passenger), as well as special purpose vessels, would be able to apply for the tonnage tax; and

  • The taxable profit from operating and selling a vessel would be covered by the tonnage tax. Further, it would extend to profits from related activities on board a vessel, provided that these do not exceed 50% of the total profit from or of the vessel.

Requirements

  • At least 60% of the fleet (i.e. 60% of all ships owned and operated by the entity and subject to the tax) should be registered with the Swiss registrar; and

  • Taxation in accordance with the tonnage tax would be voluntary and would apply only on request from the taxpayer.

Determination of profit

  • The proposed draft would introduce a lump-sum tax on the profits attributable to maritime vessels, based on registered tonnage and days in use; and

  • Where vessels meet certain ecological requirements, particularly with regard to low emissions, a reduction of up to 20% would be available, based on criteria yet to be defined.

Though a legislative draft has been issued for consultation purposes, Switzerland is clearly taking a big step towards supporting an environmentally friendly shipping industry with an attractive taxation model.

Rene Zulauf

Partner, Deloitte Switzerland

E: rzulauf@deloitte.ch


 

Manuel Angehrn

Senior manager, Deloitte Switzerland

E: maangehrn@deloitte.ch



more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Kingsley Napley’s claimants are arguing that taxing the provision of education breaches the European Convention on Human Rights
While pillar two can progress without the US, it won’t reach the same heights without American involvement, argues Renáta Bláhová, founding partner of BMB Partners Taxand
There are unanswered questions as to how foreign investors could reclaim money via tax credits, advisers suggested
Amid an ever-changing tax environment, India’s advisory market is bustling with competition ahead of the 2025 World Tax rankings and ITR Awards
The deal comes after PwC had accused Paul McNab of using confidential information; in other news, McDermott hired a new London tax head from a US rival
Looking at transfer pricing simplification is “obviously helpful”, but it should be done in line with current standards, a senior government figure reportedly said
The UK Government’s plans to close the tax gap via increased HM Revenue and Customs investment have failed to impress local tax advisers
Under the merged scheme for R&D tax relief introduced last year, rules on contracted out R&D have changed. James Dudbridge argues for a proactive approach when reviewing companies’ commercial arrangements
Cultural nuances could account for tax advisers’ perceived poor cost management, a local partner told ITR
Updated rules represent a significant shift in the Luxembourg TP landscape and emphasise the need for robust arm’s-length calculations, says Vanessa Ramos Ferrin of TransFair Pricing Solutions
Gift this article