Overcoming local complexity in a shared service environment

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Overcoming local complexity in a shared service environment

Sponsored by

tmf-grouplogo.jpg
Local complexity in a shared service environment is challenging

Pavlo Boyko of TMF Group describes how to build a successful shared service centre when reporting requirements in different countries are increasingly complex and divergent.

Centralising your operations in a shared service environment can be really challenging when you operate in multiple countries.

It can sometimes feel as if local jurisdictions are doing all they can to throw a spanner in the works of the efficiencies that make shared service centres (SSCs) such an attractive proposition.

These efficiencies include standardised accounting transactions, super-fast processes and reduced costs. But there are significant local complexities to overcome.

Local tax reporting, statutory obligations and compliance risks can vary enormously in the regions that feed into an SSC. Statutory reporting can be particularly daunting. Each jurisdiction has different, changing and often inconsistent requirements.

Finance leaders at SSCs are often required to report in multiple languages, formats and currencies. They must also follow local Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAPs) in the jurisdictions where these apply.

And it’s getting tougher, not easier, to overcome local accounting challenges, despite the trend towards more streamlined internal processes and digital transformation.

Local complexity is increasing

TMF Group’s 2021 Global Business Complexity Index (GBCI) reveals companies face far greater complexity at local level than at global level in terms of statutory reporting. The index reveals all companies must adhere to local GAAPs in 57% of jurisdictions and International Financial Reporting Standards in only 19 jurisdictions.

Even within a single jurisdiction, legislation requirements can vary greatly. When it comes to incorporation, the GBCI shows 27% of jurisdictions require notification at the provincial or state level while 42% require notification at the city or local level. Some countries, including Brazil, Mexico and Japan, require notification of incorporation at three levels: national, state and city.

The local complexity challenge has become more critical as organisations seek adopt new technologies to standardise and speed up transaction processing – arguably the biggest pull of the SSC model.

Do not just focus on tech

Rapid advances in Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) and Robotic Process Automation (RPA) bring huge efficiencies to centralised operations but digitisation cannot solve the local reporting and compliance question.

A delicate balancing act is required to marry centralised operations with local peculiarities. A finance SSC is typically a huge department carrying out a single process such as transactional accounting more quickly than localised operations. Implementing a global ERP system would appear perfect from a corporate reporting perspective but it falls down when it comes to local compliance.

How can you possibly cover all statutory requirements in all countries, especially when these requirements quickly change? And what about language, legislation and tax changes? At some stage you will require manual intervention and expertise outside the SSC.

So, what is the best way forward for finance chiefs looking to consolidate and centralise their finance and accounting functions while ensuring compliancy at local level?

The simple answer is local expertise on the ground and integrating this expertise into the shared services model.

Organisations operating in multiple jurisdictions looking to adopt or enhance the shared services model need local experts who fully understand compliance requirements and proposed changes to legislation.

Timing is critical. Organisations face an avalanche of changes in regulations as jurisdictions try to recoup monies spent amid the pandemic or lost from tax avoidance. This will increase the speed of change and place greater demands on finance leaders.

To minimise risk now and in future, it’s important to balance the need to digitalise finance with the need to manage local compliance, especially when finance leaders are under increasing pressure to make efficiencies and to possibly outsource certain elements of their operations.

This requires a bold new SSC strategy that leverages the benefits of tech-driven centralised operations for better transactional accounting and the benefits of local expertise for better reporting and compliance, completing the ‘last mile’ of the journey to greater efficiency.

 

Pavlo Boyko 

Accounting and tax global solution architect, TMF Group

E: pavlo.boyko@tmf-group.com

 

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Kingsley Napley’s claimants are arguing that taxing the provision of education breaches the European Convention on Human Rights
While pillar two can progress without the US, it won’t reach the same heights without American involvement, argues Renáta Bláhová, founding partner of BMB Partners Taxand
There are unanswered questions as to how foreign investors could reclaim money via tax credits, advisers suggested
Amid an ever-changing tax environment, India’s advisory market is bustling with competition ahead of the 2025 World Tax rankings and ITR Awards
The deal comes after PwC had accused Paul McNab of using confidential information; in other news, McDermott hired a new London tax head from a US rival
Looking at transfer pricing simplification is “obviously helpful”, but it should be done in line with current standards, a senior government figure reportedly said
The UK Government’s plans to close the tax gap via increased HM Revenue and Customs investment have failed to impress local tax advisers
Under the merged scheme for R&D tax relief introduced last year, rules on contracted out R&D have changed. James Dudbridge argues for a proactive approach when reviewing companies’ commercial arrangements
Cultural nuances could account for tax advisers’ perceived poor cost management, a local partner told ITR
Updated rules represent a significant shift in the Luxembourg TP landscape and emphasise the need for robust arm’s-length calculations, says Vanessa Ramos Ferrin of TransFair Pricing Solutions
Gift this article