China tightens tax administration on employee share schemes and technology enterprises

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

China tightens tax administration on employee share schemes and technology enterprises

Sponsored by

sponsored-firms-kpmg.png
Tax authorities are particularly focused on employee share schemes and technology enterprises

Lewis Lu of KPMG discusses the recent moves on strengthening tax administration on Employee Share Ownership Plan arrangements and tightening scrutiny on high-and-new technology enterprises.

During the period of greatest COVID-19 disruption in 2020, the Chinese tax authorities took a lighter touch on tax enforcement so as not to put additional pressures on businesses, as indeed was the case in many countries. Now, with the recovery of the economy, tax enforcement efforts are also recovering their full vigour, with particular focus areas being employee share schemes and technology enterprises.

New tax reporting requirements for ESOP arrangements

In China, companies implementing a new Employee Share Ownership Plan (ESOP) and looking to access individual income tax (IIT) deferral incentives for their staff must make certain filings. 

There is a full tax reporting in the case of public companies and a so-called ‘recordal’ filing in the case of private companies. With ESOPs seeing ever greater use and an increasing focus on IIT compliance by the tax authorities, these reporting and recordal requirements are now being enhanced in Circular Shui Zong Ke Zheng Fa [2021] No. 69. The enhanced filing requirements supplement those already prescribed in the existing Circulars Caishui No. 35 (2005) and Caishui No. 101 (2016).  

The authorities will now receive more comprehensive information on how the various entities, including employer, ESOP platform, investee entities, are inter-related. The ESOP arrangements of Chinese companies with inverted structures used for overseas listing, so-called ‘variable interest entity’ (VIE) structures, will also be caught by the new reporting.

Apart from enhancing enforcement, it is understood that China tax policymakers are looking to leverage the information they gather from the new reporting to evaluate whether, and in what manner, to extend the existing preferential IIT treatment for ESOPs. This is due to expire on December 31 2021. Enterprises are advised to monitor for developments in this space.

Scrutiny on HNTE status tightened

China’s flagship corporate income tax (CIT) incentive is the 15% reduced CIT rate provided to high-and-new technology enterprises (HNTEs). This compares with the standard CIT rate of 25%. 

Enterprises will often claim this in combination with the super deduction for research and development (R&D) expenses. Further enhancements were made in STA Announcement No. 28 of September 2021. Enterprises are allowed to claim the super deduction of R&D expenses incurred in the first three quarters of 2021 under the provisional CIT filing for the third quarter or the month of September (to be completed in October). Previously, R&D expenses super deduction could only be claimed in the annual CIT filing after the year end.

While the Chinese government provides generous tax incentives to HNTEs, recognition and review of HNTE status are becoming ever more stringent. On-site checks have been made in several cities such as Beijing, Qingdao, Haikou, Suzhou, Guangzhou, and Zhuhai. As disclosed on several official websites, 97 enterprises in Beijing, 220 enterprises in Jiangsu province, and 21 enterprises in Guangdong province have been disqualified from their HNTE status in 2021. 

From September 15 2021 to October 25 2021, the national leading office for HNTE recognition and administration (i.e. Torch High Technology Industry Development Centre of Ministry of Science & Technology) conducted a nationwide inspection on the recognition and administration of HNTE by 36 local offices. 

The inspection focused on whether the HNTE recognition and supervision performed by the local offices was in line with the existing rules and regulations, as well as the implementation of the relevant preferential tax treatment. We expect to see local offices, which in the past may have adopted a more flexible and tolerant approach to awarding HNTE status, take a more rigorous approach going forward.

Given this, enterprises should review the basis on which they secured their HNTE status to ensure this is robust and avoid the risk of the associated tax incentives being clawed back. 

 

Lewis Lu

Partner, KPMG China

E: lewis.lu@kpmg.com

 

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

India also brokered its first-ever multilateral APA last year, the Central Board of Taxes announced
A global tax framework may not materialise anytime soon, but a common set of principles is becoming increasingly necessary, Rudolf Winkenius also tells ITR
Kingsley Napley’s claimants are arguing that taxing the provision of education breaches the European Convention on Human Rights
While pillar two can progress without the US, it won’t reach the same heights without American involvement, argues Renáta Bláhová, founding partner of BMB Partners Taxand
There are unanswered questions as to how foreign investors could reclaim money via tax credits, advisers suggested
Amid an ever-changing tax environment, India’s advisory market is bustling with competition ahead of the 2025 World Tax rankings and ITR Awards
The deal comes after PwC had accused Paul McNab of using confidential information; in other news, McDermott hired a new London tax head from a US rival
Looking at transfer pricing simplification is “obviously helpful”, but it should be done in line with current standards, a senior government figure reportedly said
The UK Government’s plans to close the tax gap via increased HM Revenue and Customs investment have failed to impress local tax advisers
Under the merged scheme for R&D tax relief introduced last year, rules on contracted out R&D have changed. James Dudbridge argues for a proactive approach when reviewing companies’ commercial arrangements
Gift this article