Corporate tax issues in South Africa’s 2019 budget

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Corporate tax issues in South Africa’s 2019 budget

Sponsored by

sponsored-firms-ww.png
AdobeStock_282651186_zebra 630 x 570

A number of proposed tax changes were highlighted in documents released as part of South Africa's annual budget on February 20 2019. The draft legislation dealing with these will only be released for comment later in the year, but some of the key takeaways have been highlighted below.

There were no proposed increases in either direct or indirect tax rates. There were also no adjustments to the income tax brackets for individuals, which will result in significant additional tax simply as a result of inflation.

South Africa's corporate rules, which provide tax neutral treatment for certain types of qualifying group re-organisations, are to be amended in order to make it clear that any transfer between group companies of assets (which on transfer could trigger foreign exchange gains or losses) will be excluded from this group relief. This will result in unrealised exchange gains or losses being triggered in the transferring company, despite the transfer meeting the general requirements for tax neutral tax treatment. The policy reason for this proposal is unclear.

In 2017, changes were made to the rules governing share buybacks and dividend stripping to prevent taxpayers from avoiding tax payable on certain disposals of shares. The National Treasury now intends to target an arrangement which it perceives to be a disguised disposal involving the distribution by a company of a substantial dividend to its existing shareholder(s), followed by an issue of shares in that company to a new shareholder. This perceived loophole will be closed with effect from February 20 2019.

On the international tax side, all income of a controlled foreign company (CFC) can be sheltered from potential attribution to the CFC's South Africa shareholders, if that CFC has suffered foreign tax equal to at least 75% of the tax that it would have paid under South African tax rules, had it been a tax resident. In view of the global trend towards reduced corporate tax rates, consideration will be given to reducing the 75% rate to a lower exemption threshold.

The rules currently in place targeting profits made by CFCs from selling goods sourced from South Africa-connected persons or providing services to South Africa-connected persons are to be expanded in order to take account of structures which involve more than one CFC in the relevant supply chain.

South Africa's transfer pricing (TP) rules apply to transactions between "connected persons" as defined in the Income Tax Act. Consideration is being given to amending this definition (at least for TP purposes) to bring it more in line with the concept of "associated enterprises" as defined by the OECD. South African rules aimed at limiting deductions for interest payable on cross-border debt funding are also to be reviewed against international best practice.

A new commissioner to lead the South African Revenue Service (SARS) will be announced shortly and structural changes will be made at SARS to increase the agency's efficiency.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The Australian Taxation Office believes the Swedish furniture company has used TP to evade paying tax it owes
Supermarket chain Morrisons is facing a £17 million ($23 million) tax bill; in other news, Donald Trump has cut proposed tariffs
The controversial deal will allow US-parented groups to be carved out from key aspects of pillar two
Awards
ITR invites tax firms, in-house teams, and tax professionals to make submissions for the 2027 World Tax rankings and the 2026 ITR Tax Awards globally
Pillar two was ‘weakened’ when it altered from a multinational convention agreement to simply national domestic law, Federico Bertocchi also argued
Imposing the tax on virtual assets is a measure that appears to have no legal, economic or statistical basis, one expert told ITR
The EU has seemingly capitulated to the US’s ‘side-by-side’ demands. This may be a win for the US, but the uncertainty has only just begun for pillar two
The £7.4m buyout marks MHA’s latest acquisition since listing on the London Stock Exchange earlier this year
ITR’s most prolific stories of the year charted public pillar two spats, the continued fallout from the PwC Australia tax leaks scandal, and a headline tax fraud trial
The climbdowns pave the way for a side-by-side deal to be concluded this week, as per the US Treasury secretary’s expectation; in other news, Taft added a 10-partner tax team
Gift this article