Poland: Poland widens definition of related parties
International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX
Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Poland: Poland widens definition of related parties

Sponsored by

sponsored-firms-mddp.png
sunflower-2881039-1280.jpg

Polish taxpayers will be able to apply new criteria to determine whether parties are related or not for tax purposes from 2019.

Polish taxpayers will be able to apply new criteria to determine whether parties are related or not for tax purposes from 2019. The new definition of "related parties" has been extended to include "significant influence".

The outcome may influence not only the scope of transfer pricing (TP) documentation, but also the tax deductible cost of group charges.

Transfer pricing regulations in Poland have been much stricter than elsewhere in Europe for many years. In most cases in Europe, only capital relations are reviewed while analysing arm's-length prices.

Until the end of 2018, Polish taxpayers were obliged to identify related parties not only based on capital relations (level of direct or indirect shares at 25%, and 5% until the end of 2016), but also in respect to control, management and family relations.

The new, wider definition seeks to include situations where structures are established in capital groups involving an investment fund, for instance, or a foundation or ownership structure specifically modeled on relations.

The idea of exerting "significant influence" is recognised if an individual has the actual ability to influence key business decisions of an entity.

In this respect, relations can also be identified in cases where a person has no formal authority or control in the government of an entity (e.g. at the board of directors or supervisory board level, for instance), and may significantly influence the strategic economic decisions made by the entity.

Examples stated by the legislator include making a decision to abandon a part of a business activity, implementing a new product in the market, taking over a part of a business from a related entity, and influencing the pricing strategy.

Therefore, "significant influence" can be identified in the case of an individual who could have a significant impact on the TP of an entity. The significant impact also exists in the case of family relations (being married, kinship, affinity, or second-degree affinity).

In practice, identifying a relation triggered by "significant influence" could be very challenging, cost-intensive and time-consuming for each organisation, particularly regarding cases featuring many departments.

For example, a number of entities that dispose of employees engaged in making business decisions, or cooperation with subcontractors, or those engaged in negotiations in business agreements, can face a dilemma regarding whether such employees could trigger relations with a subcontractor, for instance.

The new approach employed by tax administrations in new contexts remains to be seen.

In this respect, taxpayers in Poland should pay close attention to fulfilling all TP reporting obligations, and when making tax deductions on a related party's charges.

Transactions exceeding circa €690,000 ($790,000) per year are tax deductible only up to €690,000 + 5% earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amoritisation (EBITDA).

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Staff will be required to spend 60% of their time with clients or in the office, it is understood
Fears that advisers would have to disclose sensitive mental health information to prospective clients were addressed, but Australian tax bodies still harbour worries
Partners in EY’s tax advisory practice have also reportedly been dismissed; in other news, PwC has lost another Chinese auditing client in the wake of the Evergrande matter
Labour’s anticipated plans to reform the UK’s corporation tax regime presents a timely opportunity, a debate featuring former UK Treasury minister David Gauke heard last night
The masterminds behind an ‘unusual’ advertisement launched by six Australian tax associations against controversial ethical rules won’t reveal the campaign’s costs
White & Case’s tax controversy head discusses how to stop a dispute before it starts and shares insights from a significant TP case with the IRS
John Ball is currently serving as a managing director at Google, based in Sydney
The full-page advertisements are running ahead of a key summit with the government on Friday, but ITR understands some professional bodies see the campaign as counterproductive
US calls for talks with Canada over digital service tax, Argentina cuts withholding taxes, and more
The ‘big four’ firms want guidance on reporting forms, the use of the XBRL filing mechanism, and permanent establishment reporting
Gift this article