Greece amends century-old corporate laws

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Greece amends century-old corporate laws

Sponsored by

eygreece.png
 Some tax authorities are looking to audits as a means of replenishing depleted coffers

Law 4548/2018 (new law) on sociétés anonymes (SAs), or corporations in Greece, entered into force on January 1 2019, replacing Law 2190/1920, which governed the operations of corporations in Greece for almost one century.

Although Law 2190/1920 has been amended repeatedly, there were still many issues which needed to be revised, abolished or introduced in order to establish an efficient legal regime in line with the economic environment.

In light of this environment, the new law introduced a number of European directives, including EU Directive 2017/828 for the encouragement of long-term shareholder engagement, EU Directive 2013/34/EU on annual financial statements, EU Directive 2007/36/EC on the rights of shareholders of listed companies, and EU Directive 2017/1132, which relates to certain aspects of company law.

Furthermore, the new law clarified certain ambiguities regarding corporate practice. It confirmed that:

  • Share capital may be paid by offsetting claims of a (potential or existing) shareholder against the company;

  • A shareholders pre-emptive right may be abolished by a Board of Directors (BoD) resolution on certain conditions;

  • Third parties may attend general shareholders meetings on certain conditions; and

  • The share capital may be reduced and dividends may be paid in kind following valuation by a certified auditor.

Furthermore, the new law provides new types of titles that may be issued by a société anonyme, such as warrants and combined titles, while de-materialised shares may also be issued by non-listed SAs.

Bearer shares are also abolished and all shares must be registered, which is in line with the goals pursued by EU Directive 2015/849.

The minimum share capital is set at €25,000 ($28,000), while the minimum nominal share value has decreased from €0.30 to €0.04 in the interest of flexibility. The payment of the share capital must be verified by a certified auditor, although certain exceptions are provided (in which case the certification is made by the BoD).

It is further noted that any amounts deriving from the issuance of shares higher than the nominal value may be offset with losses from company losses (in certain conditions). However, they may not be distributed as dividends.

Furthermore, the new law clarified in detail what profit amounts may be distributed as dividends, in order to ensure that they correspond to realised profits as opposed to goodwill.

Finally, it is noted that issuance and/or partial transfer of a title (i.e. with only part of the rights incorporated), is prohibited without prejudice to joint rights, usufruct, pledge, and the transfer of autonomous proprietary rights (e.g. the right to dividends).

Overall, the New Law is a significant step toward efficiency, flexibility and modernisation of the legal regime of SAs, and is capable of contributing to the development of entrepreneurship and attraction of investment.

The views reflected in this article are the views of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the global EY organization or its member firms.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The UK’s Labour government has an unpopular prime minister, an unpopular chancellor and not a lot of good options as it prepares to deliver its autumn Budget
Awards
The firms picked up five major awards between them at a gala ceremony held at New York’s prestigious Metropolitan Club
The streaming company’s operating income was $400m below expectations following the dispute; in other news, the OECD has released updates for 25 TP country profiles
Software company Oracle has won the right to have its A$250m dispute with the ATO stayed, paving the way for a mutual agreement procedure
If the US doesn't participate in pillar two then global consensus on the project can’t be a reality, tax academic René Matteotti also suggests
If it gets pillar two right, India may be the ideal country that finds a balance between its global commitments and its national interests, Sameer Sharma argues
As World Tax unveils its much-anticipated rankings for 2026, we focus on EMEA’s top performers in the first of three regional analyses
Firms are spending serious money to expand their tax advisory practices internationally – this proves that the tax practice is no mere sideshow
The controversial deal would ‘preserve the gains achieved under pillar two’, the OECD said; in other news, HMRC outlined its approach to dealing with ‘harmful’ tax advisers
Former EY and Deloitte tax specialists will staff the new operation, which provides the firm with new offices in Tokyo and Osaka
Gift this article