Survey: Untangling CFC rules and regimes

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Survey: Untangling CFC rules and regimes

panic

Companies have to navigate a web of differing rules targeting controlled foreign corporations (CFCs) and their shareholders, but the process is far from easy when the distinctions in each country’s rules risk unexpected audits or an unreasonably high tax burden.

Taxpayers can voice their concerns anonymously in International Tax Review’s survey on CFC rules and regimes.

There are a number of different policy drivers for CFC regimes worldwide. Because no one solution would suit all countries, the OECD and EU approaches provide a range of solutions that can be implemented while creating a more coordinated approach to taxing CFCs and their owners.

Share your opinion on the opportunities and challenges of managing tax liabilities across parent companies and their CFCs through our latest tax survey. The survey will end on Friday, May 3 2019

Your responses are strictly anonymous.

There is also the opportunity to provide feedback on tax modelling, US tax reform, the EU Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive, the implementation of BEPS Action 3 worldwide and how proposals on a potential global minimum corporate tax rate may impact your business.

The results will be featured across a series of articles online and compiled in International Tax Review’s upcoming magazine issue. 

For further details, or to share your opinions with our editorial team, email danish.mehboob@euromoneyplc.com.

Take the survey here

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The threat of 50% tariffs on Brazilian goods coincides with new Brazilian legal powers to adopt retaliatory economic measures, local experts tell ITR
The country’s chancellor appears to have backtracked from previous pillar two scepticism; in other news, Donald Trump threatened Russia with 100% tariffs
In its latest G20 update, the OECD also revealed tense discussions with the US where the ‘significant threat’ of Section 899 was highlighted
The tax agency has increased compliance yield from wealthy individuals but cannot identify how much tax is paid by UK billionaires, the committee also claimed
Saffery cautioned that documentation requirements in new government proposals must be limited if medium-sized companies are not exempted from TP
The global minimum tax deal is not viable without US participation, Friedrich Merz has argued
Section 899 of the ‘one big beautiful’ bill would have spelled disaster for many international investors into the US, but following its shelving, attention turns to the fate of the OECD’s pillars
DLA Piper’s co-head of tax for the US and Latin America tells ITR about her fervent belief in equal access to the law, loving yoga, and paternal inspirations
Tax expert Craig Hillier agrees with the comparison of pillar two to using a sledgehammer to crack a nut
The amount is reported to be up 57% from the £5.6bn that the UK tax agency believes was underpaid in the previous year
Gift this article