Italy: Italy implements the EU’s Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Italy: Italy implements the EU’s Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive

Sponsored by

sponsored-firms-hager.png
intl-updates-small.jpg

On 28 December 2018, the Italian government published Legislative Decree No. 142, transposing the European Union's Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive (2016/1164) into Italian legislation. The new set of provisions will be effective from the fiscal year following December 31 2018. The decree will aim to tackle tax avoidance practices related to interest deduction, exit tax, rules on foreign controlled companies, a definition of financial intermediaries, and hybrid mismatches, all of which are explored below.

Interest deduction

Firstly, a new definition of interest is provided. More specifically, interest payments and interest income now include:

  • Interest as defined under the accounting principles and confirmed as such under current tax provisions; and

  • Interest deriving from a transaction, financial relationship, or relationship with a significant financing component.

The limitations under Article 96 of the Italian Tax Code (TUIR) are also extended to:

  • Interest payments included in the cost of assets under Article 110 (1b) of the TUIR; and

  • Interest payments for mortgage-backed loans on proper-ties rented out.

Moreover, interest payments that exceed interest income and 30% of earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT), regardless of whether they belong to the current year or are carried forward, may be deducted in subsequent tax periods, up to an amount equal to the difference between:

  • Interest income of the tax period and 30% of EBIT; and

  • Interest payments of the tax period.

Exit tax

The new decree sets out in detail the individual scope of the so-called exit tax. The exit tax applies whenever taxpayers in Italy (be they a resident for tax purposes or a permanent establishment) transfer abroad either their (i) fiscal residence, or (ii) a permanent establishment, or (iii) assets. In such cases, the capital gain generated from the difference between the market value and fiscally recognised cost of the asset/liability transferred abroad is subject to taxation.

Losses incurred in previous years may be deducted from the capital gain. It will be determined in compliance with the criteria set forth under the new Article 166-bis.

Under certain circumstances, the taxes calculated on the capital gain (net of losses) can be paid in five annual instalments.

Controlled foreign companies (CFC)

In order for the CFC provisions to be applicable, non-resident companies are deemed controlled if the Italian taxpayer:

  • Holds direct or indirect control under Article 2359 of the Italian Civil Code; or

  • Owns directly or indirectly more than 50% of the profits distributed.

Furthermore, foreign-based, permanent establishments of non-resident controlled taxpayers and resident taxpayers that opted for the branch exemption scheme are deemed controlled taxpayers.

The new provisions no longer distinguish between black list and white list countries. The CFC provisions apply if the non-resident controlled taxpayers jointly meet the following pre-requisites:

  • They are subject to actual taxation that is less than half of the taxes applicable in Italy (simplification criteria for comparison are still to be defined by decree); and

  • More than one-third of their income qualifies as interest or other income (e.g. interest or royalties).

Financial intermediaries

Newly introduced Article 162-bis of the TUIR provides a definition of:

  • Financial intermediaries;

  • Financial holding companies; and

  • Non-financial holding companies and similar companies.

The provisions apply starting from fiscal year 2018. The changes will have an impact also on the Italian regional production tax (IRAP).

Hybrid mismatches

The ATAD Decree introduces a package of measures on hybrid mismatches with the aim of tackling double deduction or "deduction without income inclusion" (deduction of a negative income component in one country without any taxation in the other country) due to a different characterisation of financial instruments, payments, entities, and permanent establishments in various countries.

Such mismatches are those registered at international level. Any domestic mismatches will continue to be tackled through general anti-abuse rules.

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Holland & Knight, Nelson Mullins and McCarter & English made the joint-most tax partner hires in the US last year, according to annual ITR Talent Tracker data
Despite a three-year-high in tax revenues generated from settling TP cases, HMRC reported a sharp fall in resolved MAP disputes
Inflexion’s proposed minority stake in Baker Tilly Netherlands could propel the firm in the Dutch market, CEO Ronald Hoeksel tells ITR
While the US’s dramatic exit from the OECD’s global tax deal naturally grabbed headlines, Trump’s premeditated move shouldn’t detract from pillar two’s lofty ambitions
The ‘big four’ firm’s audit of gambling company Entain is under the spotlight; in other news, Ireland shrugs off Trump’s rejection of pillar two
Mid-market European private equity house Inflexion, which also backs law firm DWF, has agreed to acquire a minority stake in the Dutch tax advisory firm
Donald Trump’s inauguration, pillar two, APAs and TP were all up for discussion as ITR spoke to Baker McKenzie’s two newly minted US partners
In-house teams that want a balance of internal control and external expertise for pillar two should seriously consider co-sourcing models, Russell Gammon of Tax Systems argues
The OECD has vowed to continue working with the US despite the president effectively pulling the country out of the organisation’s global minimum tax deal
Norton Rose Fulbright highlights a Brazilian investment fund as a practical example of how new Dutch tax rules will require significant attention from foreign companies
Gift this article