European Union: Public country-by-country reporting in the EU off the tracks, for now

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

European Union: Public country-by-country reporting in the EU off the tracks, for now

Sponsored by

sponsored-firms-pwc.png
intl-updates-small.jpg

During a debate at the European Parliament in mid-April 2018, a representative from the Council of the European Union confirmed to members of the European Parliament (MEPs) that there were "unresolved political issues" which prevented agreement at the council on the European Commission's April 2016 pending proposal for public country-by-country reporting (public CbCR). The two largest parties in the European Parliament, the EPP (Christian Democrats) and the S&D (Social Democrats), asked the council to unblock the negotiations on the proposal for public CbCR. This was generally understood to be the last chance to reach a deal as Austria, which holds the six-monthly rotating EU Council presidency from July 1 to December 31 2018, and could drive discussions in the council forward, is not in favour of the commission's proposal. Germany's new Federal Finance Minister Olaf Scholz said in June 2018 that the German government needed more time and he also counselled caution about the Commission's proposal and hinted at following a tax-centric approach instead.

Indeed, one of the thorniest political issues surrounding the Commission's protracted 2016 draft directive is its legal base, which has divided the EU's member states as well as the EU's institutions from the start. Both the legal services of the European Parliament and the European Commission have taken the formal view that there is no conflict in the Commission's choice of the legal basis for its proposal, since the draft public CbCR directive in their opinion is a tax transparency financial reporting tool, and not a fiscal matter as such, which would require unanimity voting in the Council (giving each of the EU-28 individual member states a right to veto the proposal). The Council's legal service however does not agree with its counterparts at the Parliament and the Commission.

Members of the European Parliament have expressed their discontent with the now prolonged impasse around public CbCR, arguing that some EU member states are using the legal basis issue as a pretext to delay any meaningful negotiations on this file.

EU Tax Commissioner Pierre Moscovici indicated in April 2018 that a deal would probably not be reached within the Juncker Commission's mandate which ends on October 31 2019.

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Thin capitalisation rules limit the amount of debt deductions that can be claimed but regard must also be given to other income tax law provisions, the ATO said
Police may be inside the Sydney office for ‘several days’, PwC Australia’s chief executive officer said
The source of additional remuneration received by PwC Australia CEO Kevin Burrowes had been the subject of much parliamentary scrutiny
The Independent Schools Council is bringing litigation against the UK government for what it calls an ‘unprecedented education tax’
But the firm said that ‘difficult market conditions’ led to a slowdown in Asia Pacific; in other news, OECD begins Thailand accession process
The move will provide certainty to taxpayers and reduce the risk associated with pricing transactions for TP, according to India’s Ministry of Finance
Pia Honkala, co-head of Aibidia’s operational TP product, tells ITR how her company works in harmony with advisers like the ‘big four’ to revolutionise clients’ processes
The UK is ‘heading to Scandinavia’ as its tax burden increases and isn’t creating an attractive environment for a wave of investment, experts have told ITR
Japan, South Korea and Germany increased their R&D tax budgets at a much greater rate over a 14-year period, say RCK Partners and the London Business School
Under the proposed directive, multinationals with numerous EU presences would have to make only one filing to comply with pillar two
Gift this article