EU Council agrees on ‘quick fixes’ for intra-community transactions on goods and domestic VAT fraud

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

EU Council agrees on ‘quick fixes’ for intra-community transactions on goods and domestic VAT fraud

Sponsored by

Sponsored_Firms_deloitte.png
EU Council agrees on quick fixes

On October 2 2018, the EU Council agreed to adopt several proposals from the European Commission to reform the EU VAT system. These proposals included four 'quick fixes' to the prevailing regime that will apply to improve the functioning of the existing VAT system, pending the introduction of the 'definitive' VAT system that is still the subject of continuing discussion.

The following measures will become effective on January 1 2020:

  • The first measure relates to the VAT exemption on intra-community supplies of goods, i.e. goods dispatched or transported from one EU member state to another member state. In particular, sellers can face difficulties when confronted with contradictory requests for proof of transport by the different member states. The EU Council has agreed on common evidence the seller must maintain to prove the intra-community transport to be able to exempt these supplies. Thus, tax administrations in the EU no longer should require evidence not included in this list.

  • The second measure relates to 'call-off' stock, i.e. a stock of goods owned by a seller where a buyer can take and use the goods as needed for its own activities. If the stock owned by the seller is located in another member state, the seller generally must register for VAT in that state and charge local VAT to its customer. Some but not all member states provide an exemption from registration and shift the payment of VAT to the customer. Under the new rules, all member states will be required to apply this regime, thus shifting the payment of VAT to the buyer of the goods.

  • The third quick fix relates to chain transactions, i.e. successive supplies of goods that are made via a single intra-community transport. This transport can be ascribed to only one supply, and only this supply can be VAT-exempt as an intra-community supply, which often leads to difficulties for taxpayers. Under the new rules, the transport will be ascribed to the first supply in the chain, i.e. the sale from the first seller to an intermediary. However, if the intermediary is registered in the member state of the first seller and has properly communicated its VAT number, the intra-community transport will be ascribed to the last supply in the chain, i.e. the sale made by the intermediary to the final buyer. It should be noted that the new rules address chain transactions with only one intermediary.

  • The fourth measure is reserved for member states experiencing substantial VAT fraud (e.g. Greece, Italy, Poland and Romania, among others). Under strict conditions, these member states may introduce a temporary 'general reverse charge mechanism' for all local supplies of goods or services valued at greater than €17,500 ($20,000) between persons registered for VAT in their member state. Under this mechanism, sellers and service providers no longer will have to charge VAT to their customers; instead, the customers will have to pay the VAT directly to the national treasury.

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

It is understood that the US has vowed to oppose any outcome from talks taking place at the UN
It’s the second year in a row that RSM’s tax business has posted fee income growth above 10%
Recent guidance from the Indian tax authorities should provide confidence for investors, says Sanjay Sanghvi of Khaitan & Co
Grant Wardell-Johnson also suggests there could be solutions to the friction between the US and the OECD when it comes to pillar two
The president had so far avoided announcing tariffs on the US’s neighbours despite previous threats
The firm brought in three managing directors from EY and Deloitte in Europe; in other news, KPMG’s bid to practise law in US was delayed
One expert argues the ERS would be unlikely to improve taxpayers’ experience unless it comes with additional funding to hire more agents and staff
From pillar two and amount B to Apple’s headline EU Commission dispute, Martin Bonner and Yiwen Ping of Kreston Global argue that 2024’s key TP developments will inform 2025
Holland & Knight, Nelson Mullins and McCarter & English made the joint-most tax partner hires in the US last year, according to annual ITR Talent Tracker data
Despite a three-year-high in tax revenues generated from settling TP cases, HMRC reported a sharp fall in resolved MAP disputes
Gift this article