Recent Portuguese rulings shed light on taxation of foreign trusts

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Recent Portuguese rulings shed light on taxation of foreign trusts

Sponsored by

sponsored-firms-garrigues.png
Recent Portuguese rulings shed light on taxation of foreign trusts

The Portuguese tax authorities recently published three rulings covering taxation of income derived from foreign fiduciary structures by resident individuals.

The rulings come after the 2015 personal income tax reform that introduced into the Portuguese tax law the concept of fiduciary structures. The tax framework applicable to the income derived by Portuguese resident individuals from fiduciary structures following that reform may be summarised as follows:

  • Ordinary distributions during the lifetime of the fiduciary structure to resident individuals are qualified as investment income (Category E) and subject to tax at a flat rate of 28%. Distributions from fiduciary structures domiciled in blacklisted jurisdictions are taxed at the aggravated rate of 35%.

  • Termination distributions from the fiduciary structure arising from liquidation, revocation or termination of such structure will be qualified as follows:

  • Capital gain or loss (Category G) when derived by the settlor and taxed at a flat rate of 28%. When paid by fiduciary structures domiciled in blacklisted jurisdictions the capital gains are taxed at the aggravated rate of 35%.

  • When distributed to an entitled party other than the settlor (e.g. a beneficiary) it is excluded from taxation under the Personal Income Tax (PIT) Code. Such distribution is qualified under the stamp tax code as a gratuitous transfer of goods potentially subject to a 10% tax rate if falling under the territorial scope of stamp tax.

The tax rulings shed some important light on taxation of income paid by fiduciary structures by confirming that:

  • Liquidation distributions from a trust of cash deposited in a Swiss bank to a beneficiary tax resident in Portugal – despite being a triggering event for stamp tax purposes – fall outside the territorial scope of stamp tax. This is because monetary values are deposited in a bank account located outside of Portugal and without headquarters, place of effective management or permanent establishment in Portugal.

  • Liquidation distributions to persons other than the settlor (e.g. a beneficiary) in the framework of the trust termination events are expressly excluded from PIT in Portugal.

  • Liquidation distributions to a Portuguese resident individual who is both settlor and beneficiary of the trust is not a triggering event for stamp tax purposes, as the stamp tax code only refers to distributions to persons other than the settlor (and because they are then subject to PIT).

  • A trustee is not subject to stamp tax on the distributions to beneficiaries in the framework of trust termination events, as the trustee is acting on a fiduciary basis and is not entitled to any amount from the termination of the trust.

The tax rulings constitute a positive step in such a complex field as taxation of foreign trusts. Naturally some points remain unclear, such as the exact scope of the term 'fiduciary structure' and the types of trusts involved, the transfer of assets from the settlor to the trustee, or the residence of trusts and sourcing rules. All this considered, case-by-case analysis is still needed to determine the concrete tax implications of foreign trusts in Portugal.

Cassiano

mendes.jpg

Tiago Cassiano

Neves

António Mendes

Tiago Cassiano Neves (tiago.cassiano.neces@garrigues.com) and António Mendes (antonio.mendes@garrigues.com)

Garrigues

Tel: +351 231 821 200

Fax: +351 231 821 290

Website: www.garrigues.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The threat of 50% tariffs on Brazilian goods coincides with new Brazilian legal powers to adopt retaliatory economic measures, local experts tell ITR
The country’s chancellor appears to have backtracked from previous pillar two scepticism; in other news, Donald Trump threatened Russia with 100% tariffs
In its latest G20 update, the OECD also revealed tense discussions with the US where the ‘significant threat’ of Section 899 was highlighted
The tax agency has increased compliance yield from wealthy individuals but cannot identify how much tax is paid by UK billionaires, the committee also claimed
Saffery cautioned that documentation requirements in new government proposals must be limited if medium-sized companies are not exempted from TP
The global minimum tax deal is not viable without US participation, Friedrich Merz has argued
Section 899 of the ‘one big beautiful’ bill would have spelled disaster for many international investors into the US, but following its shelving, attention turns to the fate of the OECD’s pillars
DLA Piper’s co-head of tax for the US and Latin America tells ITR about her fervent belief in equal access to the law, loving yoga, and paternal inspirations
Tax expert Craig Hillier agrees with the comparison of pillar two to using a sledgehammer to crack a nut
The amount is reported to be up 57% from the £5.6bn that the UK tax agency believes was underpaid in the previous year
Gift this article