Switzerland: Beware of equity incentive reporting obligations in Switzerland

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Switzerland: Beware of equity incentive reporting obligations in Switzerland

intl-updates-small.jpg

Employers in Switzerland are required to provide details on employee equity incentive holdings in a statement included with the annual Swiss salary certificate.

These statements are known as 'equity annexes', and all companies awarding equity incentives to Swiss-based (resident or non-resident) employees must comply with this requirement. Equity annexes are not new, but the cantonal tax authorities throughout the country are becoming stricter when ensuring that equity incentive reporting is accurate. Failure to comply can be costly for employers, both from a reputational and a financial perspective.

Employee equity incentive reporting for internationally mobile employees can be challenging even for the best run payroll departments. Employers should be aware of the following.

Misreporting

Common equity incentive reporting mistakes include:

  • Failure to prepare annexes when no transaction has taken place;

  • Failure to include all required information in the reporting document; and

  • Reporting only the Swiss taxable portion of income in the salary certificate (the authorities require full reporting).

These mistakes can have an impact on the calculation of an employee's income tax liability.

Consequences of failure to comply

The requirement to prepare equity annexes has been in existence for five years as of January 2018. Certain tax authorities previously tolerated non-filers as long as equity income was reported in the salary certificate; however, this practice has shifted over the years and employers that fail to file correct annexes now face stiff penalties.

When inaccurate annexes are discovered for the tax period in progress, the Swiss tax authorities often also will audit prior years' reporting to check for similar mistakes. Switzerland's 10-year statute of limitations can make this exercise challenging for plan administrators and payroll departments.

Other business benefits

Aside from the compliance requirements, proper reporting of employee equity incentives has business benefits, such as:

  • It is an easy way to verify total equity income, which is helpful in cases of multiple exercises and vestings;

  • It clearly shows the allocation of foreign and Swiss-sourced equity income for purposes of reporting income in the salary certificate;

  • It provides a helpful overview for employees by showing the different sources of employment income for the relevant year, the income they can expect to realise in the following years and the vesting dates of the shares in their employee portfolio;

  • It enables employees to accurately report their equity income on the tax return; and

  • It provides useful information for human resources and global mobility teams with Swiss-based employees.

Comments

Employers should invest time in reviewing the requirements for employee equity incentive reporting. Once the obligations are well-understood, the process can be automated and administered by payroll generalists.

van-den-eeckhaut.jpg
schneider.jpg

Renaat

van den Eeckhaut

Anna

Schneider

Renaat van den Eeckhaut (rhvandeneeckhaut@deloitte.ch) and Anna Schneider (annasschneider@deloitte.ch)

Deloitte

Tel: +41 58 279 6986 and +41 58 279 6112

Website: www.deloitte.ch

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The controversial deal will allow US-parented groups to be carved out from key aspects of pillar two
Awards
ITR invites tax firms, in-house teams, and tax professionals to make submissions for the 2027 World Tax rankings and the 2026 ITR Tax Awards globally
Pillar two was ‘weakened’ when it altered from a multinational convention agreement to simply national domestic law, Federico Bertocchi also argued
Imposing the tax on virtual assets is a measure that appears to have no legal, economic or statistical basis, one expert told ITR
The EU has seemingly capitulated to the US’s ‘side-by-side’ demands. This may be a win for the US, but the uncertainty has only just begun for pillar two
The £7.4m buyout marks MHA’s latest acquisition since listing on the London Stock Exchange earlier this year
ITR’s most prolific stories of the year charted public pillar two spats, the continued fallout from the PwC Australia tax leaks scandal, and a headline tax fraud trial
The climbdowns pave the way for a side-by-side deal to be concluded this week, as per the US Treasury secretary’s expectation; in other news, Taft added a 10-partner tax team
A vote to be held in 2026 could create Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, a $3.6bn giant with 3,100 lawyers across the Americas, EMEA and Asia Pacific
Foreign companies operating in Libya face source-based taxation even without a local presence. Multinationals must understand compliance obligations, withholding risks, and treaty relief to avoid costly surprises
Gift this article