Poland: Poland’s major tax changes for 2017

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Poland: Poland’s major tax changes for 2017

glowacki.jpg

Bartosz Głowacki

After years of discussion, Poland started to tax gains of non-residents on real estate companies, i.e. gains on shares, interest in tax transparent partnerships and collective investment vehicle units if at least 50% of assets of that entity consist of Polish real property.

In line with the law, the real estate assets test has to be made on the last day of the month proceeding the month the disposal took place, which gives the taxpayers some flexibility.

Also, the gains of non-residents on publicly traded shares will be taxable in Poland.

However, the applicable tax treaty may change the above treatment of gains on real estate companies and publicly traded shares.

Separately, the corporate income tax (CIT) exemption applicable to collective investment funds has been slightly narrowed. Now, Polish closed-end investment funds are no longer exempt, but this is only the case with regards to income earned from interest in tax transparent partnerships, income from loans granted to, and securities issued by, such partnerships. Similar limitations apply to CIT exemptions of EU/EEA seated collective investment schemes. The tax exemption applies to all other sources of income including interest, capital gains and dividends, making this form of activity still very competitive.

The new corporate taxpayers, as well as most of the small ones, are subject to 15% CIT instead of the standard rate of 19%. A taxpayer is recognised as small if its previous financial year's revenue (VAT inclusive) did not exceeded €1.2 million ($1.3 million).

Contribution in kind of assets other that an ongoing concern is now taxed as a sale. Before the amendment, the contributor was taxed on the face value of shares received in exchange for the contribution (less the deductible costs). Now, the market value of assets transferred to a company constitutes a taxable revenue and less the underlying costs is taxed with standard 19% CIT rate.

Some defined R&D qualifying costs give the right to additional 30% or 10% deduction from taxable basis.

Formal letters of practice (tax rulings), including those issued in the past, will give no protection if they relate to tax avoidance challengeable on the grounds of the general anti-avoidance rules (GAAR).

There are many new requirements for transfer pricing documentation. VAT law was also significantly amended.

Bartosz Głowacki (bartosz.glowacki@mddp.pl)

MDDP

Tel: +48 22 322 68 88

Website: www.mddp.pl

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Maintaining increased funding for HMRC is a ‘high possibility’ if he becomes PM, ITR has also heard
Awards
ITR is delighted to reveal all the shortlisted nominees for the 2026 Europe Tax Awards
The firm has hired a team of private client lawyers from Withers to launch in New York and Connecticut, though ITR analysis suggests it faces stiff competition
The ability of tax authorities to receive and analyse data is becoming ‘quite advanced’, warns Stuart Lang, head of EY’s compliance co-sourcing solution
The Court of Appeal ruling clarifies that treaty benefits are not abusive where transactions are commercially driven, providing greater certainty on “main purpose” anti-avoidance tests
Despite the Netherlands featuring an unusual concentration of World Tax-ranked technology-led providers, sources believe there’s a long way to go to challenge the established players
Ethics seems to be playing a subservient role to an entitlement culture borne out of a pervasive ‘revenue at all costs’ mentality at the big four
Historical World Tax data suggests the ‘largest law firm merger in history’ may not pose a serious threat to the world's leading tax practices
The repeal of Libya’s statute of limitations and tougher enforcement leave taxpayers navigating a high-stakes choice between conciliation and litigation
All the tax partners elevated across the UK, US and Singapore were private client specialists, continuing a market trend of intense investment and competition
Gift this article