Malta: Malta amends tax rules on qualifying employment in aviation

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Malta: Malta amends tax rules on qualifying employment in aviation

intl-updates-small.jpg
salomone.jpg
vella.jpg

Mark Galea Salomone

Donald Vella

The Maltese legislator has continuously sought to attract high-net worth individuals and highly qualified individuals to Malta's shores, especially in the financial services, gaming and aviation industries.

In 2016, the Qualifying Employment in Aviation (Personal Tax) Rules (the rules) were introduced, establishing the income tax treatment of individuals undertaking employment under a qualifying contract within the aviation industry.

Under the rules, individuals who receive remunerations that are payable under a qualifying contract of employment for work or duties carried out in Malta may be charged income tax at a reduced rate of 15%. The rules complement similar provisions in respect of employment with MFSA licenced companies and gaming companies.

A qualifying contract is one where the beneficiary derives taxable income that amounts to no less than €45,000 ($48,000) per annum (exclusive of any fringe benefits), which must be derived from an eligible office. An eligible office is one that is key for the functions of a company that operates within the aviation industry, subject to confirmation after an administrative assessment by the Malta Transport Authority. The rules exhaustively list the eligible offices including, but not limited to, the chief executive officer, chief financial officer, flight operations manager, quality systems manager and ground operations personnel.

In order to qualify as a beneficiary, an individual must satisfy a number of conditions, namely being protected as an employee under Maltese law and sufficiently proving to the Malta Transport Authority:

  • Possession of professional qualifications or experience;

  • Performance of activities of an eligible office;

  • Receipt of stable and regular resources that are sufficient for his/her own maintenance and that of his/her family;

  • Residence in accommodation considered as sufficient for a family in Malta;

  • Possession of a valid travel document;

  • Possession of health insurance; and

  • Non-domiciliation in Malta.

Under the rules, European Economic Area (EEA) and Swiss nationals may benefit from the reduced rate of income tax via a declaration signed by the beneficiary and endorsed by the Malta Transport Authority, for a consecutive period of five years commencing from the first year of assessment when that person is first liable to income tax in Malta, so long as this remains in the public interest. Third country nationals can benefit from the rules for a period of no longer than four years.

A new provision has recently been added to the rules whereby any individual claiming the reduced rate is now eligible to apply for an extension of four to five years (depending on whether the person is an EEA/Swiss national or a third country national) to the qualifying period, provided that the individual's period of eligibility does not exceed 10 years. This clause essentially provides such highly qualified persons with the opportunity to extend their attractive tax treatment in Malta, thereby guaranteeing an advantageous situation for both Malta and the relevant individuals.

Mark Galea Salomone (mark.galeasalomone@camilleripreziosi.com) and Donald Vella (donald.vella@camilleripreziosi.com)

Camilleri Preziosi

Tel: +356 21238989

Website: www.camilleripreziosi.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

While all options presented ‘drawbacks’, European Commission tax leader Wopke Hoekstra said the controversial US carve-out deal has ‘many benefits’
From tech preparations to competitiveness concerns, Tax Systems’ Russell Gammon addresses the most pressing client considerations arising from the SbS deal
Despite estimates that the US/OECD agreement will cost countries billions, the Fair Tax Foundation’s Paul Monaghan believes the deal is a ‘necessary evil’
The firm’s eye-catching UK launch is a major statement of intent, but it will face stern opposition in its quest to be the top global tax player
The postponement came after industry representatives flagged implementation issues with the registration regime; in other news, firms made key tax partner additions
Despite the increased yield, the time taken to resolve enquiries was at a six-year high, new HMRC statistics have revealed
The High Court’s dismissal of barrister Setu Kamal’s legal challenge represents the first successful strike-out under a new law on SLAPPs
IP lawyers, who say they are encouraging clients to build up ‘tariff resilience’, should treat the risks posed by recent orders as a core consideration in cross-border licensing
As Coca-Cola awaits a crucial 11th Circuit Court of Appeals decision this year, its multibillion-dollar tax dispute could have profound implications for investors, cash flow, and corporate transparency
However, women in tax face greater career obstacles than their male counterparts, an exclusive ITR survey of more than 100 women tax leaders revealed
Gift this article