Croatia: Advance pricing agreements implemented

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Croatia: Advance pricing agreements implemented

intl-updates-small.jpg
anastasiou.jpg
taci.jpg

Maria Anastasiou

Afrodita Taci

Transfer pricing legislation was introduced in Croatia by way of the Corporate Income Tax Act (CIT) on January 1 2005. However, the Croatian tax authorities have only recently recognised its importance, with advance pricing agreements (APAs) recently being implemented in Croatian tax legislation.

The implementation of APAs in national legislation (Official Gazette No. 47/15), published on May 3 2017, reveals a significant progress towards harmonising the Croatian legislation with OECD transfer pricing guidelines.

An APA can be concluded as:

  1. A unilateral APA between a taxpayer and the Tax Administration (TA); or

  2. Bilateral or multilateral APA between the taxpayer, TA, associated entities and the TA of other countries in which those associated entities are residents.

The procedure for concluding an APA consists of five stages:

  1. Submission of the initiative for the conclusion of the APA;

  2. Preliminary interview of the taxpayer by the TA, in order to exchange views and gain additional information about the APA;

  3. Submission of the statement of intention to conclude the APA by the taxpayer. This statement includes general and specific information regarding the transactions intended to be covered by the APA;

  4. The conclusion of the APA. The conclusion must include information about the related parties included in the APA, a description of the transactions and the agreed documentation methodology; and

  5. Monitoring the implementation of the APA by the TA.

The duration of an APA can be defined to be up to five years, depending on the characteristics and type of transactions subject to the agreement. The TA has the right to terminate the APA in case of a violation of any term by the taxpayer.

The cost of the APA conclusion procedure is:

  • HRK15,000 ($2,405) for a taxpayer whose profit, according to the latest tax return, is a maximum of HRK 3 million ($481,000);

  • HRK 30,000 for a taxpayer whose profit is between HRK 3 million and HRK 20 million; and

  • HRK 50,000 for a taxpayer whose profit exceeds HRK 20 million.

In the case of concluding a bilateral APA, there is a cost increase of HRK 50,000, and in case of a multilateral APA the relative cost increase is HRK 100,000.

The addition of the APAs to Croatian TP legislation indicates that intragroup transactions are becoming of high importance to the tax administration. MNEs in Croatia should reassess their significant and complicated intragroup transactions and examine the possibility of concluding an APA in order to minimise their tax risk. Your contact for further queries is:

Maria Anastasiou (maria.anastasiou@eurofast.eu) and Afrodita Taci (afrodita.taci@eurofast.eu)

Eurofast Croatia

Tel: +30 210 8257720 22 and +385 98 525 758

Website: www.eurofast.eu

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

One expert argues the ERS would be unlikely to improve taxpayers’ experience unless it comes with additional funding to hire more agents and staff
From pillar two and amount B to Apple’s headline EU Commission dispute, Martin Bonner and Yiwen Ping of Kreston Global argue that 2024’s key TP developments will inform 2025
Holland & Knight, Nelson Mullins and McCarter & English made the joint-most tax partner hires in the US last year, according to annual ITR Talent Tracker data
Despite a three-year-high in tax revenues generated from settling TP cases, HMRC reported a sharp fall in resolved MAP disputes
Inflexion’s proposed minority stake in Baker Tilly Netherlands could propel the firm in the Dutch market, CEO Ronald Hoeksel tells ITR
While the US’s dramatic exit from the OECD’s global tax deal naturally grabbed headlines, Trump’s premeditated move shouldn’t detract from pillar two’s lofty ambitions
The ‘big four’ firm’s audit of gambling company Entain is under the spotlight; in other news, Ireland shrugs off Trump’s rejection of pillar two
Mid-market European private equity house Inflexion, which also backs law firm DWF, has agreed to acquire a minority stake in the Dutch tax advisory firm
Donald Trump’s inauguration, pillar two, APAs and TP were all up for discussion as ITR spoke to Baker McKenzie’s two newly minted US partners
In-house teams that want a balance of internal control and external expertise for pillar two should seriously consider co-sourcing models, Russell Gammon of Tax Systems argues
Gift this article