Australia: The tax treatment of corporate collective investment vehicle regimes

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Australia: The tax treatment of corporate collective investment vehicle regimes

intl-updates-small.jpg
McCormack

Jock McCormack

The Australian government released exposure draft legislation on Friday 25 August on the proposed new corporate collective investment vehicle (CCIV) regime and the associated Asia region funds passport for consultation and public comment up to September 21 2017.

The CCIV regime will provide a new type of investment vehicle via a company structure that will allow Australian fund managers to more readily offer investments through an internationally recognised vehicle rather than the more common trust structure in Australia.

While the exposure draft legislation deals with the regulatory/corporations law framework, the taxation framework is expected to allow CCIVs to be treated as akin to an attribution managed investment trust (AMITs) as per division 276 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997.

These CCIVs will be provided 'flow through' treatment and investors will generally be taxed as if they have undertaken investments directly. The capital account election for AMITs will be available and non-resident investors in eligible CCIVs will be taxed at concessional rates (generally 15%) on attributed income subject to the withholding tax provisions. The usual passive investment and widely held requirements will be important to satisfy. These CCIVs should be of interest to private equity, real estate and infrastructure funds amongst others.

The Asia region funds passport initiative will allow collective investment schemes based on and regulated in one economy (the home economy) to be 'passported' or sold to investors in other economies in the region (host economies). This essentially will occur through mutual recognition whereby two or more sufficiently equivalent jurisdictions agree to recognise key aspects of each other's regulatory systems, thereby streamlining public disclosure and related requirements to this initiative. In addition to Australia, Japan, Korea, New Zealand and Thailand are participating in the region.

Separately, Chevron Group has withdrawn its appeal to the High Court over the deductibility of interest and related penalties associated with intragroup loans between Australia and the US. The Australian Taxation Office (ATO) and Chevron Group have settled their dispute and details of these arrangements are confidential and are unlikely to be released publicly. Company debt arrangements continued to be a major compliance issue and focus for the ATO and we expect further cases to come before the courts on these issues which can impact not only on interest deductibility, but also thin capitalisation, transfer pricing and related anti-avoidance rules. The ATO views the Chevron case as a significant win and time will tell whether it was decided on the special facts including the circular nature of the borrowing arrangements.

Jock McCormack (jock.mccormack@dlapiper.com)

DLA Piper Australia

Tel: +61 2 9286 8253

Fax: +61 2 9286 8007

Website: www.dlapiper.com

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Holland & Knight, Nelson Mullins and McCarter & English made the joint-most tax partner hires in the US last year, according to annual ITR Talent Tracker data
Despite a three-year-high in tax revenues generated from settling TP cases, HMRC reported a sharp fall in resolved MAP disputes
Inflexion’s proposed minority stake in Baker Tilly Netherlands could propel the firm in the Dutch market, CEO Ronald Hoeksel tells ITR
While the US’s dramatic exit from the OECD’s global tax deal naturally grabbed headlines, Trump’s premeditated move shouldn’t detract from pillar two’s lofty ambitions
The ‘big four’ firm’s audit of gambling company Entain is under the spotlight; in other news, Ireland shrugs off Trump’s rejection of pillar two
Mid-market European private equity house Inflexion, which also backs law firm DWF, has agreed to acquire a minority stake in the Dutch tax advisory firm
Donald Trump’s inauguration, pillar two, APAs and TP were all up for discussion as ITR spoke to Baker McKenzie’s two newly minted US partners
In-house teams that want a balance of internal control and external expertise for pillar two should seriously consider co-sourcing models, Russell Gammon of Tax Systems argues
The OECD has vowed to continue working with the US despite the president effectively pulling the country out of the organisation’s global minimum tax deal
Norton Rose Fulbright highlights a Brazilian investment fund as a practical example of how new Dutch tax rules will require significant attention from foreign companies
Gift this article