Argentina: Developments expected on payment mechanism of non-resident capital gains tax

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Argentina: Developments expected on payment mechanism of non-resident capital gains tax

intl-updates-small.jpg
Rodriguez-Ignacio

Ignacio Rodríguez

Since September 23 2013, capital gains derived from the transfer of shares in an Argentine company, as well as other securities obtained by non-residents, have been subject to Argentine tax.

The seller has the option – to be expressly notified to the withholding agent – of determining its tax liability by applying the 15% rate on the actual capital gain realised, duly supported, determined in Argentine currency or on a presumed basis consisting of 90% of the sales proceeds (13.5% effective rate).

So far, however, no tax had to be paid on transactions between non-residents because the Argentine tax rules did not establish a mechanism to withhold and remit that tax.

On July 18 2017, through General Resolution 4094-E, the Argentine tax authorities established the long-awaited mechanism to withhold and pay the tax due on transactions involving the transfer of Argentine securities, such as shares and equity interests in local mutual funds.

The seller's stock broker must act as the withholding tax agent if the shares are sold through a stock exchange that is authorised by the Argentine Securities Exchange Commission (CNV). If the sale does not take place through a stock exchange, then the buyer must act as the withholding tax agent, even if they are a non-resident. Neither the Income Tax Law nor the General Resolution specify the withholding tax mechanism in cases where Argentine shares are sold through a foreign stock exchange. In these situations it is uncertain whether the seller's broker or the buyer should withhold the tax.

If the buyer is a non-resident, or the transaction takes place in a foreign stock exchange, the relevant party must remit the tax to the tax authorities through an international bank wire transfer considering the information needed to prepare the respective order and the list of authorised collecting agencies on the tax authority's website (http://www.afip.gob.ar). The tax payment will be rejected if the withholding tax agent fails to provide certain information, such as the tax ID of the entity whose shares have been transferred or if the transfer is made locally.

Also, whoever is required to register the share transfer with the corporate authorities is required to provide to the tax authorities the notification of the transfer, the buyer's and seller's identities, and a copy of the withholding tax payment voucher.

Resolution 4094-E, which entered into force on July 18 2017, applies to transactions concluded on or after September 23 2013. For sales of securities concluded prior to July 18 2017, the due date to remit the tax withheld was September 29 2017.

Not surprisingly, the tax authorities received many complaints due to the retroactive effective date and the need for those who are liable to update their systems. In response, on July 20 2017, the Argentine tax authorities issued General Resolution No. 4095-E suspending the application of General Resolution 4094-E for 180 days.

It may be expected that during the suspension period the Argentine tax authorities will clarify certain open questions with regard to General Resolution No. 4094-E.

Ignacio Rodríguez (ignacio.e.rodriguez@ar.pwc.com), Buenos Aires

PwC

Tel: +54 11 4850 6714

Website: www.pwc.com/ar

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Holland & Knight, Nelson Mullins and McCarter & English made the joint-most tax partner hires in the US last year, according to annual ITR Talent Tracker data
Despite a three-year-high in tax revenues generated from settling TP cases, HMRC reported a sharp fall in resolved MAP disputes
Inflexion’s proposed minority stake in Baker Tilly Netherlands could propel the firm in the Dutch market, CEO Ronald Hoeksel tells ITR
While the US’s dramatic exit from the OECD’s global tax deal naturally grabbed headlines, Trump’s premeditated move shouldn’t detract from pillar two’s lofty ambitions
The ‘big four’ firm’s audit of gambling company Entain is under the spotlight; in other news, Ireland shrugs off Trump’s rejection of pillar two
Mid-market European private equity house Inflexion, which also backs law firm DWF, has agreed to acquire a minority stake in the Dutch tax advisory firm
Donald Trump’s inauguration, pillar two, APAs and TP were all up for discussion as ITR spoke to Baker McKenzie’s two newly minted US partners
In-house teams that want a balance of internal control and external expertise for pillar two should seriously consider co-sourcing models, Russell Gammon of Tax Systems argues
The OECD has vowed to continue working with the US despite the president effectively pulling the country out of the organisation’s global minimum tax deal
Norton Rose Fulbright highlights a Brazilian investment fund as a practical example of how new Dutch tax rules will require significant attention from foreign companies
Gift this article