Switzerland: Federal Council issues draft legislation on Tax Reform Proposal 17

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Switzerland: Federal Council issues draft legislation on Tax Reform Proposal 17

intl-updates-small.jpg
hess.jpg
zulauf.jpg

Jackie

Hess

René

Zulauf

On September 6 2017, the Swiss Federal Council issued the draft legislation for the Swiss Tax Reform Proposal 17 (STR 17, formerly known as Swiss Corporate Tax Reform III). The proposal that largely follows the recommendations of the steering committee represents a well-balanced and internationally competitive solution that would ensure that Switzerland stays an attractive location for multinationals and domestic companies alike, while at the same time providing an internationally aligned tax system that is in conformity with international standards, such as OECD BEPS and others.

The main proposed changes compared to CTR III include:

  • The notional interest deduction (NID) on federal and cantonal level is no longer part of the package;

  • The partial taxation for individual shareholders holding at least 10% would be increased to 70% from 60% on a federal level and mandatorily at least to 70% for all cantons; and

  • The combined tax relief for the patent box, the R&D super deduction and the amortisation from the step-up of hidden reserves due to a status change prior to STR 17 shall be limited to a maximum of 70% on a cantonal and communal level.

The main proposed elements of STR 17 include:

  • The sunset of all special corporate tax regimes, such as the mixed, domiciliary, holding and principal company regimes, as well as the Swiss finance branch regime;

  • The tax-privileged release of 'hidden reserves' for cantonal/communal tax purposes for companies transitioning out of tax-privileged cantonal tax regimes (such as mixed or holding companies) into ordinary taxation, with the intent to mitigate such effects by providing companies with a lower tax rate during a transition period of five years;

  • A reduction of the general cantonal/communal tax rates at the discretion of the individual cantons. Various cantons can be expected to be in the 12%–14% ETR bracket (effective combined federal/cantonal/communal tax rates);

  • The introduction of a mandatory cantonal-level patent box regime applicable to all patented intellectual property (IP) for which the research and development (R&D) spend occurred in Switzerland, based on the OECD modified nexus approach;

  • The introduction of cantonal R&D incentives in the form of deductions of up to 150% of qualifying R&D expenditure at the discretion of the individual cantons; and

  • A step-up of asset basis (including for self-created goodwill) for direct federal and cantonal/communal tax purposes upon the migration of a company or additional activities and functions into Switzerland.

Expected timeline

The proposed legislation will now enter the consultation procedure, which lasts for three months and under which the various stakeholders can weigh in on the legislation, so that the final version can be introduced into and voted on by the Swiss Parliament in its spring session of 2018. It seems currently unlikely that there would be a referendum (public vote) on the legislation, so that STR 17 could enter into force as soon as January 1 2020, but no later than January 1 2021.

Jackie Hess (jahess@deloitte.ch) and René Zulauf (rzulauf@deloitte.ch)

Deloitte

Tel: +41 58 279 6312 and +41 58 279 6359

Website: www.deloitte.ch

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Partners are divided on Italy vs PDM D’s analytical depth, evidentiary standards, and what the judgment signals for future intra-group financing cases
As GCCs increasingly become strategic hubs, multinationals face heightened risks around permanent establishment and place of effective management
While all options presented ‘drawbacks’, European Commission tax leader Wopke Hoekstra said the controversial US carve-out deal has ‘many benefits’
From tech preparations to competitiveness concerns, Tax Systems’ Russell Gammon addresses the most pressing client considerations arising from the SbS deal
Despite estimates that the US/OECD agreement will cost countries billions, the Fair Tax Foundation’s Paul Monaghan believes the deal is a ‘necessary evil’
The firm’s eye-catching UK launch is a major statement of intent, but it will face stern opposition in its quest to be the top global tax player
The postponement came after industry representatives flagged implementation issues with the registration regime; in other news, firms made key tax partner additions
Despite the increased yield, the time taken to resolve enquiries was at a six-year high, new HMRC statistics have revealed
The High Court’s dismissal of barrister Setu Kamal’s legal challenge represents the first successful strike-out under a new law on SLAPPs
IP lawyers, who say they are encouraging clients to build up ‘tariff resilience’, should treat the risks posed by recent orders as a core consideration in cross-border licensing
Gift this article